Russell Patricia L, Nurius Paula S, Herting Jerald R, Walsh Elaine, Thompson Elaine A
University of Washington.
Vict Offender. 2010;5(4):329-353. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2010.509655.
To date few reports have provided direct comparison of psychosocial vulnerability and resources among youth with victimization and perpetration histories. Within a racially diverse, high-risk adolescent sample (n = 849), this study undertakes MANCOVA tests on a multidimensional set of risk and protective factors contrasting youth with histories of 1) neither violent victimization nor perpetration, 2) victimization only , 3) both perpetration only, and 4) both victimization and perpetration. All three violence-affected groups reported elevated risk and diminished protection, with perpetrating victims demonstrating the greatest psychosocial impairment. Detailed contrasts among the youth group profiles provide insights regarding overlapping and distinct developmental etiologies and implications for preventive and remedial intervention.
迄今为止，很少有报告对有受害和犯罪史的青少年的心理社会脆弱性和资源进行直接比较。在一个种族多样的高风险青少年样本（n = 849）中，本研究对一组多维的风险和保护因素进行了多变量协方差分析测试，对比了以下四类青少年：1）既无暴力受害经历也无犯罪经历；2）仅有受害经历；3）仅有犯罪经历；4）既有受害经历又有犯罪经历。所有三个受暴力影响的群体都报告了更高的风险和更低的保护水平，其中既是受害者又是犯罪者表现出最大的心理社会损伤。青少年群体概况之间的详细对比为重叠和不同的发展病因以及预防和补救干预的意义提供了见解。
