• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of inpatient treatment costs after balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical treatment of vertebral body compression fractures.球囊椎体后凸成形术与非手术治疗椎体压缩性骨折患者住院治疗费用比较。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20(8):1259-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1692-y. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty and nonsurgical management in patients hospitalised with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a UK cost-effectiveness analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术与椎体成形术和非手术治疗在急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折住院患者中的成本效果比较:英国的一项成本效果分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):355-67. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2102-y. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
3
Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty in patients with symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in a UK setting.在英国,球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗有症状的椎体压缩性骨折的成本效益分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Sep;21(9):1599-608. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1096-6. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
4
[Comparison of clinical and radiological data in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using radiofrequency kyphoplasty or balloon kyphoplasty].[使用射频椎体后凸成形术或球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的临床和放射学数据比较]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Feb;150(1):56-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280122. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
5
Balloon kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Jul;9(4):423-36. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.27.
6
A prospective, international, randomized, noninferiority study comparing an implantable titanium vertebral augmentation device versus balloon kyphoplasty in the reduction of vertebral compression fractures (SAKOS study).一项前瞻性、国际性、随机、非劣效性研究,比较了植入式钛椎体增强装置与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术在减少椎体压缩性骨折方面的疗效(SAKOS 研究)。
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1782-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Balloon Kyphoplasty for Patients With Acute/Subacute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in the Super-Aging Japanese Society.在超老龄化的日本社会中,球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗急性/亚急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折的成本效益分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):E298-E305. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002829.
8
Survival and cost comparison of kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty using German claims data.利用德国索赔数据对椎体后凸成形术和经皮椎体成形术的生存率及成本比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):318-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000135.
9
Secondary balloon kyphoplasty for new vertebral compression fracture after initial single-level balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.在初次对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折进行单节段球囊椎体后凸成形术后,针对新出现的椎体压缩骨折进行二次球囊椎体后凸成形术。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jul;26(7):1842-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4784-x. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:系统评价与成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(17):1-290. doi: 10.3310/hta18170.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of the Level of Evidence in Economic Evaluations of Medical Devices: The Example of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty.医疗器械经济评估证据水平的系统评价:椎体成形术和后凸成形术的实例
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 10;10(12):e0144892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144892. eCollection 2015.
2
Health economic aspects of vertebral augmentation procedures.椎体强化手术的卫生经济学方面
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Apr;26(4):1239-49. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2953-5. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
3
In not only vertebroplasty but also kyphoplasty, the resolution of vertebral deformities depends on vertebral mobility.在椎体成形术和后凸成形术中,椎体畸形的缓解都依赖于椎体的活动度。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jul;34(7):1474-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3424. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
4
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.米歇尔·贝努瓦斯特与罗伯特·马尔霍兰德年度《欧洲脊柱杂志》述评:对《欧洲脊柱杂志》2011年“外科手术与研究”类文章的调查
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2127-5. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: an evidenced-based review of the literature.椎体成形术和后凸成形术治疗椎体压缩性骨折:基于证据的文献综述
Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
2
Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial.球囊后凸成形术与非手术治疗椎体压缩骨折的疗效及安全性比较(FREE):一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2009 Mar 21;373(9668):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.比较椎体后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后的疼痛缓解情况。
Pain Physician. 2007 Jul;10(4):583-90.
4
Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体压缩骨折:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug;16(8):1085-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0308-z. Epub 2007 Feb 3.
5
Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety.球囊后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗椎体压缩性骨折:疗效与安全性的比较系统评价
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2747-55. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244639.71656.7d.
6
Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.瑞典与骨质疏松性骨折相关的成本和生活质量
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-0015-8. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
7
The hospital cost of vertebral fractures in the EU: estimates using national datasets.欧盟椎体骨折的医院费用:使用国家数据集的估计值。
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Jun;14(5):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1395-2. Epub 2003 Apr 30.
8
Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.老年女性的椎体骨折与死亡率:一项前瞻性研究。骨质疏松性骨折研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jun 14;159(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.11.1215.
9
Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland.瑞士因骨质疏松性骨折住院的发病率及直接医疗费用。
Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):414-25. doi: 10.1007/pl00004149.
10
Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures.基于人群的骨质疏松性骨折后生存率研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 May 1;137(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116756.

球囊椎体后凸成形术与非手术治疗椎体压缩性骨折患者住院治疗费用比较。

Comparison of inpatient treatment costs after balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical treatment of vertebral body compression fractures.

机构信息

Institute for Musculoskeletal Analysis, Research and Therapy, Piaristengasse 2-4, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20(8):1259-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1692-y. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1692-y
PMID:21290150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3175857/
Abstract

We performed an analysis of following costs after primary conservative or operative treatment with balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Patients with primary osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated with BKP or conservatively from discharge year 2002-2005 were retrospectively assessed regarding the following hospital treatment in any hospital in Austria from 2002 to 2006. A statistical record linkage between the hospital data and the mortality registry of Statistic Austria was performed. The data search was restricted to ICD-10 and procedures according to the Austrian catalogue of procedures defined as "spine relevant". Number of readmissions, length of hospital stay and DRG related costs were calculated for the surgical and conservative group separately. 324.5 years (mean 2.93 ± 1.40, conservative group) and 343.6 (mean 2.56 ± 0.96, BKP group) of 110 conservative patients and 134 BKP patients were analyzed. There was no statistical difference of the mortality rate with 9 patients (6.7%, BKP) and 11 patients (9.9%, conservative). The number of readmissions was 1.62 times higher (P = 0.039), the length of stay 1.09 times higher (P = 0.046) in the conservative group. No difference in the DRG scores were found (P = 0.11). In conclusion, patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed in the following years after BKP fewer hospital readmissions and shorter hospital stays but no difference in DRG scores in comparison to conservatively treated patients.

摘要

我们对初次接受保守或球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(BKP)治疗的骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的以下费用进行了分析。对 2002-2005 年初次接受 BKP 或保守治疗的原发性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者进行回顾性评估,了解其 2002 年至 2006 年在奥地利任何一家医院的以下治疗情况。对医院数据和奥地利统计局死亡率登记处进行了统计记录链接。数据搜索仅限于国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)和奥地利程序目录中定义的“脊柱相关”程序。分别计算手术和保守组的再入院次数、住院时间和 DRG 相关费用。对 110 例保守治疗患者和 134 例 BKP 患者的 324.5 年(保守组平均 2.93±1.40)和 343.6 年(BKP 组平均 2.56±0.96)进行了分析。BKP 组有 9 例(6.7%)和保守组 11 例(9.9%)患者死亡,死亡率无统计学差异。保守组的再入院次数高 1.62 倍(P=0.039),住院时间长 1.09 倍(P=0.046)。DRG 评分无差异(P=0.11)。总之,与保守治疗患者相比,接受 BKP 治疗的骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者在 BKP 治疗后随访的几年中,再入院次数更少,住院时间更短,但 DRG 评分无差异。