Institute for Musculoskeletal Analysis, Research and Therapy, Piaristengasse 2-4, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20(8):1259-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1692-y. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
We performed an analysis of following costs after primary conservative or operative treatment with balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Patients with primary osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated with BKP or conservatively from discharge year 2002-2005 were retrospectively assessed regarding the following hospital treatment in any hospital in Austria from 2002 to 2006. A statistical record linkage between the hospital data and the mortality registry of Statistic Austria was performed. The data search was restricted to ICD-10 and procedures according to the Austrian catalogue of procedures defined as "spine relevant". Number of readmissions, length of hospital stay and DRG related costs were calculated for the surgical and conservative group separately. 324.5 years (mean 2.93 ± 1.40, conservative group) and 343.6 (mean 2.56 ± 0.96, BKP group) of 110 conservative patients and 134 BKP patients were analyzed. There was no statistical difference of the mortality rate with 9 patients (6.7%, BKP) and 11 patients (9.9%, conservative). The number of readmissions was 1.62 times higher (P = 0.039), the length of stay 1.09 times higher (P = 0.046) in the conservative group. No difference in the DRG scores were found (P = 0.11). In conclusion, patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed in the following years after BKP fewer hospital readmissions and shorter hospital stays but no difference in DRG scores in comparison to conservatively treated patients.
我们对初次接受保守或球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(BKP)治疗的骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的以下费用进行了分析。对 2002-2005 年初次接受 BKP 或保守治疗的原发性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者进行回顾性评估,了解其 2002 年至 2006 年在奥地利任何一家医院的以下治疗情况。对医院数据和奥地利统计局死亡率登记处进行了统计记录链接。数据搜索仅限于国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)和奥地利程序目录中定义的“脊柱相关”程序。分别计算手术和保守组的再入院次数、住院时间和 DRG 相关费用。对 110 例保守治疗患者和 134 例 BKP 患者的 324.5 年(保守组平均 2.93±1.40)和 343.6 年(BKP 组平均 2.56±0.96)进行了分析。BKP 组有 9 例(6.7%)和保守组 11 例(9.9%)患者死亡,死亡率无统计学差异。保守组的再入院次数高 1.62 倍(P=0.039),住院时间长 1.09 倍(P=0.046)。DRG 评分无差异(P=0.11)。总之,与保守治疗患者相比,接受 BKP 治疗的骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者在 BKP 治疗后随访的几年中,再入院次数更少,住院时间更短,但 DRG 评分无差异。