Suppr超能文献

脂多糖刘易斯抗原

Lipopolysaccharide Lewis Antigens

作者信息

Appelmelk Ben J., Vandenbroucke-Grauls Christina M. J. E.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit Medical School, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

As determined by serological techniques, the O-antigen of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of more than 80% of strains tested worldwide express Lewis blood group antigens (36, 60, 71). This percentage possibly represents an underestimation; it was demonstrated that some strains do not react with anti-Lewis x (Le) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) while structurally they were shown to express Le (39). Thus, Lewis antigen expression in is highly conserved. This restricted diversity in O-antigen structure is striking, and the question arises whether Lewis antigens play a role in pathogenesis. An analogous situation is found in , where conserved LPS O-antigen epitopes directly interact with the host via ligand-lectin binding (35). There are additional reasons why LPS Lewis antigens are thought to play a role in pathogenesis beyond merely providing length to the LPS (although length itself already contributes to virulence) (7). (i) LPS displays phase variation, defined as the high frequency of reversible change of LPS phenotype (2, 5, 68, 69). In other bacteria ( spp. and ), phase variation of LPS is crucial to virulence (37, 65). (ii) LPS displays molecular mimicry with the host (4). Gastric human epithelial cells also express Le blood group antigens. The expression by microorganisms of surface structures similar to those found in the host is called molecular mimicry. Examples of other pathogens displaying molecular mimicry are and spp. (33). The role of mimicry in pathogenesis can be twofold. (a) mimicry is pathogenic. Infection might break tolerance to the shared epitopes and induce autoantibodies. Bound antibodies may induce tissue damage, for instance, by fixing complement. (b) Molecular mimicry might provide immune escape by preventing the formation of antibodies directed to the epitopes shared by self and microorganism; the lack of response to a surface-located antigen might contribute to persistence of infection. (iii) Lewis antigens might interact with host lectins. Several host lectins are known to interact with host Lewis antigens (22, 42); the same lectins may interact with Lewis antigens. Such interaction may have biological consequences such as bacterial adhesion, colonization, and cytokine induction. In this chapter, we will discuss phase variation of LPS, including LPS biosynthesis and genetics; the biological significance of Lewis antigen mimicry; and the role of Lewis antigens in interactions of with host lectins.

摘要

通过血清学技术测定,全球超过80%的测试菌株的脂多糖(LPS)O抗原表达Lewis血型抗原(36、60、71)。这个百分比可能被低估了;已证明一些菌株不与抗Lewis x(Le)单克隆抗体(MAb)反应,但在结构上它们被证明表达Le(39)。因此,幽门螺杆菌中Lewis抗原的表达高度保守。O抗原结构中这种有限的多样性很显著,于是就产生了幽门螺杆菌Lewis抗原是否在发病机制中起作用的问题。在沙门氏菌中发现了类似的情况,其中保守的LPS O抗原表位通过配体-凝集素结合直接与宿主相互作用(35)。除了仅仅为LPS提供长度(尽管长度本身已经对毒力有贡献)之外,还有其他原因认为幽门螺杆菌LPS Lewis抗原在发病机制中起作用(7)。(i)幽门螺杆菌LPS表现出相变,定义为LPS表型的高频可逆变化(2、5、68、69)。在其他细菌(大肠杆菌和霍乱弧菌)中,LPS的相变对毒力至关重要(37、65)。(ii)幽门螺杆菌LPS与宿主表现出分子模拟(4)。胃人类上皮细胞也表达Le血型抗原。微生物表达与宿主中发现的表面结构相似的结构被称为分子模拟。其他表现出分子模拟的病原体的例子有肺炎链球菌和酿脓链球菌(33)。模拟在发病机制中的作用可能是双重的。(a)分子模拟是致病的。感染可能会打破对共享表位的耐受性并诱导自身抗体。结合的抗体可能会诱导组织损伤,例如通过固定补体。(b)分子模拟可能通过阻止针对自身和微生物共享表位的抗体形成来提供免疫逃逸;对表面定位抗原缺乏反应可能有助于感染的持续存在。(iii)幽门螺杆菌Lewis抗原可能与宿主凝集素相互作用。已知几种宿主凝集素与宿主Lewis抗原相互作用(22、42);相同的凝集素可能与幽门螺杆菌Lewis抗原相互作用。这种相互作用可能会产生生物学后果,如细菌黏附、定植和细胞因子诱导。在本章中,我们将讨论幽门螺杆菌LPS的相变,包括LPS生物合成和遗传学;Lewis抗原模拟的生物学意义;以及Lewis抗原在幽门螺杆菌与宿主凝集素相互作用中的作用。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验