• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆能力选择性影响真实和欺骗性反应动态的证据。

Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics.

作者信息

Farrow Tom F D, Hopwood Marie-Clare, Parks Randolph W, Hunter Michael D, Spence Sean A

机构信息

SCANLab, Academic Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, The Longley Centre, Northern General Hospital, University of Sheffield, England.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2010 Winter;123(4):447-53. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447.

DOI:10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447
PMID:21291161
Abstract

In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function should affect truthful and deceptive response times. To investigate this we examined the relationship between performance on a semantic knowledge deception task and a test of verbal memory in 40 college students. We found that verbal memory performance differentially affects the temporal parameters of truth and deception.

摘要

在欺骗的执行模型中,说谎需要抑制真实的优势反应(即真相),而这种抑制会带来时间上的代价,表现为更长的反应时间。如果记忆过程参与生成这些真相,那么记忆功能应该会影响真实和欺骗性反应的时间。为了对此进行研究,我们考察了40名大学生在语义知识欺骗任务中的表现与言语记忆测试之间的关系。我们发现言语记忆表现对真实和欺骗的时间参数有不同影响。

相似文献

1
Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics.记忆能力选择性影响真实和欺骗性反应动态的证据。
Am J Psychol. 2010 Winter;123(4):447-53. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447.
2
Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.性别和个性特征会影响说实话或说谎所需时间的差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Oct;97(2):451-60. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.451.
3
The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling.背外侧前额叶皮质对欺骗和说实话准备的贡献。
Brain Res. 2012 Jun 29;1464:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 9.
4
Generating lies produces lower memory predictions and higher memory performance than telling the truth: Evidence for a metacognitive illusion.编造谎言比说实话产生更低的记忆预测和更高的记忆表现:元认知错觉的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):465-484. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000459. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.说实话的人经得起时间的考验,与说谎者相比,他们在犯罪发生数月后,推翻证据的情况更少。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;42(2):145-155. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000278.
6
Truthful yet misleading: Elementary second-order deception in school-age children and its sociocognitive correlates.真实但具有误导性:学龄儿童的基本二阶欺骗及其社会认知相关性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jan;237:105759. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105759. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?欺骗意图:在谎言甚至尚未说出之前,能否对欺骗线索进行测量?
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0125237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125237. eCollection 2015.
8
The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.冲突中的自我:执行过程在关于态度的真实和欺骗性回应中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):469-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
9
Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.在一场金融风险博弈中,利用阿尔法波段脑磁图信号对真实反应与欺骗性反应进行单试次辨别。
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.050. Epub 2006 May 4.
10
When lying changes memory for the truth.当说谎改变了对真相的记忆。
Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):2-14. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1340286. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of deception on memory: a comparative study of actors and eyewitnesses accounts.欺骗对记忆的影响:演员和目击者证言的比较研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;12(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02152-3.
2
Syntactic complexity differentially affects auditory sentence comprehension performance for individuals with age-related hearing loss.句法复杂性对患有年龄相关性听力损失的个体的听觉句子理解能力有不同程度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1264994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1264994. eCollection 2023.
3
Are Intelligent People Better Liars? Relationships between Cognitive Abilities and Credible Lying.
聪明人更擅长说谎吗?认知能力与可信谎言之间的关系。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 3;11(4):69. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040069.
4
The "good cop, bad cop" effect in the RT-based concealed information test: exploring the effect of emotional expressions displayed by a virtual investigator.基于反应时的隐蔽信息测试中的“红脸白脸”效应:探究虚拟调查员所展现的情绪表达的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 20;10(2):e0116087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116087. eCollection 2015.