Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal 576104, India.
J Clin Lipidol. 2007 Aug;1(4):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
To compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of simvastatin and ezetimibe vs simvastatin monotherapy in Indian patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
This multicentric, double-blind, comparative, study conducted in India enrolled 230 patients with hypercholesterolemia (baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] >120 mg/dL for patients on previous hypolipidemic drugs or >135 mg/dL for naïve subjects) were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin (10 mg/day) or simvastatin (10 mg) plus ezetimibe (10 mg) FDC for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to 12 weeks of therapy for simvastatin monotherapy vs simvastatin plus ezetimibe FDC. Secondary efficacy endpoints were mean percentage of changes in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline to end of treatment, as well as proportion of patients achieving National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III target LDL-C levels in each risk category.
At the end of 12 weeks, the mean percentage reduction from baseline in LDL-C (-33.7%) was significantly greater with simvastatin and ezetimibe FDC compared to simvastatin alone (-26.28%, P < 0.05). Significantly greater percentage of patients (88%, P < 0.001) attained National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C target levels following ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment compared to simvastatin monotherapy (71%). Reductions in TG were significantly greater with ezetimibe/simvastatin than simvastatin (P < 0.001). Increases in HDL-C, and reduction in TC were similar between treatment groups. Safety and tolerability profiles were comparable for both treatments.
Fixed-dose combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe provides a more effective means for reducing LDL cholesterol levels in Indian patients with hypercholesterolemia than simvastatin monotherapy without compromising the safety and tolerability profile.
比较固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)辛伐他汀和依折麦布与辛伐他汀单药治疗在印度原发性高胆固醇血症患者中的疗效和安全性。
这项在印度进行的多中心、双盲、对照研究共纳入 230 例高胆固醇血症患者(既往降脂药物治疗时基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 [LDL-C] >120mg/dL,或初治患者时基线 LDL-C >135mg/dL),患者被随机分为两组,分别接受辛伐他汀(10mg/天)或辛伐他汀(10mg)联合依折麦布 FDC(10mg)治疗 12 周。主要疗效终点为辛伐他汀单药治疗与辛伐他汀联合依折麦布 FDC 治疗 12 周时 LDL-C 自基线的平均百分比变化。次要疗效终点为总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)自基线至治疗结束时的平均百分比变化,以及每个风险类别的患者达到国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组 III 目标 LDL-C 水平的比例。
治疗 12 周后,与辛伐他汀单药治疗相比,辛伐他汀和依折麦布 FDC 使 LDL-C 自基线的平均降低百分比(-33.7%)显著更大(-26.28%,P < 0.05)。接受依折麦布/辛伐他汀治疗的患者中(88%,P < 0.001),达到国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组 III LDL-C 目标水平的比例显著高于辛伐他汀单药治疗组(71%)。依折麦布/辛伐他汀组的 TG 降低幅度显著大于辛伐他汀组(P < 0.001)。两组间 HDL-C 的升高和 TC 的降低相似。两种治疗的安全性和耐受性特征相似。
固定剂量复方制剂辛伐他汀和依折麦布在降低印度高胆固醇血症患者的 LDL 胆固醇水平方面比辛伐他汀单药治疗更有效,同时不影响安全性和耐受性。