Center of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jan-Feb;68(1):29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
To test the integrity of knots tied with expired suture and non-expired suture, using 5 different suture materials.
Knots were tied using expired and non-expired chromic catgut, polyglactin 910, polydioxanone, silk, or coated polyester. Expired sutures were a mean of 10.5 years past the date of expiration stamped on the packaging. Suture packaging was inspected for any flaws or humidity. There were 116 knots with expired suture and 109 non-expired knots. All knots were tied by hand. Suture was soaked in 0.9% sodium chloride for 60 seconds and subsequently transferred to a tensiometer where the tails of the knots were cut to 3 mm length. We compared the tensile strength of knots using a tensiometer to pull the knots until the suture broke or untied. A minimum of 30 knots were needed in order to detect a statistically significant main effect for expired and non-expired sutures with 80% power and a 5% chance of type I error.
A total of 225 knots were tied. Overall, we found no difference in mean tension between expired suture (77.5 ± 31.7 N) and non-expired suture at failure (81.9 ± 30.2 N). All the sutures broke at the knot and none untied. Expired chromic and polydioxanone were significantly weaker than the non-expired suture of the same material (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in tensile strength between expired absorbable or permanent suture materials. Based on a univariate analysis of variance ([SCAP]ANOVA)[R] there was no difference in the tension at failure between expired and non-expired sutures with suture packet as a covariate. No suture untied when knotted with expired suture.
Under laboratory conditions, expired chromic and polydioxanone sutures broke at lower tensile strength than non-expired sutures of the same material.
使用 5 种不同的缝线材料,测试过期缝线和未过期缝线所打结的完整性。
使用过期和未过期铬制肠线、聚甘醇酸 910、聚二氧杂环己酮、丝线或涂层聚酯缝线来打结。过期缝线的使用时间是包装上标注的失效日期之后的平均 10.5 年。检查缝线包装是否有任何瑕疵或受潮。共有 116 个过期缝线结和 109 个未过期缝线结。所有缝线结均为手工打结。缝线在 0.9%氯化钠中浸泡 60 秒,然后转移到张力计上,将缝线结的尾部剪至 3 毫米长。我们使用张力计比较缝线结的拉伸强度,直到缝线断裂或解开缝线结。为了以 80%的功效和 5%的Ⅰ类错误概率检测过期缝线和未过期缝线之间的统计学显著主效应,需要至少 30 个缝线结。
共打结 225 个缝线结。总体而言,我们未发现失效时过期缝线(77.5 ± 31.7 N)和未过期缝线(81.9 ± 30.2 N)之间的平均张力有差异。所有缝线均在缝线结处断裂,无缝线解开。过期铬制肠线和聚二氧杂环己酮与相同材质的未过期缝线相比明显较弱(p = 0.002 和 p = 0.001)。在拉伸强度方面,过期可吸收缝线和永久性缝线之间没有统计学显著差异。基于单变量方差分析([SCAP]ANOVA)[R],缝线包作为协变量,失效时缝线的张力在过期和未过期缝线之间没有差异。用过期缝线打结时,没有缝线解开。
在实验室条件下,过期铬制肠线和聚二氧杂环己酮缝线的断裂拉伸强度低于相同材质的未过期缝线。