• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The military health system's personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health.军事卫生系统的个人健康记录试点项目与微软 HealthVault 和谷歌健康。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):118-24. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004671. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
2
Patient and provider perspectives of personal health record use: a multisite qualitative study in HIV care settings.患者和医疗服务提供者对个人健康记录使用的看法:一项在 HIV 护理环境中的多地点定性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):475-485. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac118.
3
An Architecture and Management Platform for Blockchain-Based Personal Health Record Exchange: Development and Usability Study.基于区块链的个人健康记录交换架构与管理平台:开发与可用性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 9;22(6):e16748. doi: 10.2196/16748.
4
Patient interest in sharing personal health record information: a web-based survey.患者对分享个人健康记录信息的兴趣:一项基于网络的调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):805-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00002.
5
The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.个人健康记录悖论:医疗保健专业人员的观点以及组织和临床环境中个人健康记录系统的信息生态
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 4;15(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2443.
6
Assessing the HIPAA standard in practice: PHR privacy policies.评估实践中的《健康保险流通与责任法案》标准:个人健康记录隐私政策。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2380-3. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090664.
7
Lessons learned from usability testing of the VA's personal health record.从 VA 个人健康记录的可用性测试中吸取的经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i13-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000082. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
8
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.如果我们提供它,他们会接受吗?影响患者对个人健康记录和安全消息传递使用意愿的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243.
9
A qualitative study of how patients with type 2 diabetes use an electronic stand-alone personal health record.一项关于2型糖尿病患者如何使用独立电子个人健康记录的定性研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Apr;21(4):296-300. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0084. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
10
Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.初级保健中绑定式个人健康记录的传播与应用
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 1;12(Spring):1c. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic health record in military healthcare systems: A systematic review.军事医疗系统中的电子健康记录:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 12;20(2):e0313641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313641. eCollection 2025.
2
A Technology Acceptance Model for Deploying Masks to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan (My Health Bank): Web-Based Cross-sectional Survey Study.用于在台湾(我的健康银行)部署口罩以对抗 COVID-19 大流行的技术接受模型:基于网络的横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 21;23(4):e27069. doi: 10.2196/27069.
3
A minimum data set of user profile or electronic health record for chemical warfare victims' recommender system.用于化学战受害者推荐系统的用户档案或电子健康记录的最小数据集。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2995-3004. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_261_20. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
5
Electronic personal health record use among registered nurses.注册护士使用电子个人健康记录的情况。
Nurs Outlook. 2015 May-Jun;63(3):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
6
CCR+: Metadata Based Extended Personal Health Record Data Model Interoperable with the ASTM CCR Standard.CCR+:基于元数据的扩展个人健康记录数据模型,可与ASTM CCR标准实现互操作。
Healthc Inform Res. 2014 Jan;20(1):39-44. doi: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.1.39. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
7
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.如果我们提供它,他们会接受吗?影响患者对个人健康记录和安全消息传递使用意愿的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243.
8
Design of a Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing System using IHE-XDS and OWL.一种使用IHE-XDS和OWL的个人健康记录与健康知识共享系统的设计
J Med Syst. 2013 Apr;37(2):9921. doi: 10.1007/s10916-012-9921-4. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.医学文献理解中常见错误的分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Dec;45(6):1151-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients.使电子健康记录可供患者使用所面临的挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):116-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000261. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
America's "undiscovered" laboratory for health services research.美国健康服务研究的“未被发现”的实验室。
Med Care. 2010 Aug;48(8):751-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e35be8.
2
Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization.在管理式医疗组织中,个人健康记录的使用存在差异。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):683-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3169. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
3
National electronic health record interoperability chronology.国家电子健康记录互操作性年表。
Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5 Suppl):35-42. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-03-9708.
4
Force Health Protection: the mission and political context of the longitudinal health record.部队健康保护:纵向健康记录的使命与政治背景
Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5 Suppl):12-20. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-03-9408.
5
Toward a DoD/VA longitudinal health record: politics and the policy landscape.迈向国防部/退伍军人事务部纵向健康记录:政治与政策格局
Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5 Suppl):4-11. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-03-9308.
6
Your doctor's office or the Internet? Two paths to personal health records.你的医生办公室还是互联网?获取个人健康记录的两条途径。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1276-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0810264.
7
The limits of free speech: the PHR problem.言论自由的限度:公共卫生责任问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):282-3. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3069. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
8
The value of personal health record (PHR) systems.个人健康记录(PHR)系统的价值。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:343-7.
9
Emerging approaches to PHR design, development and use.个人健康记录(PHR)设计、开发和使用的新兴方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:937.
10
Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care.整合个人健康记录:以消费者为中心的护理变革工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 6;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-45.

军事卫生系统的个人健康记录试点项目与微软 HealthVault 和谷歌健康。

The military health system's personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health.

机构信息

Clinical Informatics Department, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):118-24. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004671. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1136/jamia.2010.004671
PMID:21292705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3116258/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To design, build, implement, and evaluate a personal health record (PHR), tethered to the Military Health System, that leverages Microsoft® HealthVault and Google® Health infrastructure based on user preference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot project was conducted in 2008-2009 at Madigan Army Medical Center in Tacoma, Washington. Our PHR was architected to a flexible platform that incorporated standards-based models of Continuity of Document and Continuity of Care Record to map Department of Defense-sourced health data, via a secure Veterans Administration data broker, to Microsoft® HealthVault and Google® Health based on user preference. The project design and implementation were guided by provider and patient advisory panels with formal user evaluation.

RESULTS

The pilot project included 250 beneficiary users. Approximately 73.2% of users were < 65 years of age, and 38.4% were female. Of the users, 169 (67.6%) selected Microsoft® HealthVault, and 81 (32.4%) selected Google® Health as their PHR of preference. Sample evaluation of users reflected 100% (n = 60) satisfied with convenience of record access and 91.7% (n = 55) satisfied with overall functionality of PHR.

DISCUSSION

Key lessons learned related to data-transfer decisions (push vs pull), purposeful delays in reporting sensitive information, understanding and mapping PHR use and clinical workflow, and decisions on information patients may choose to share with their provider.

CONCLUSION

Currently PHRs are being viewed as empowering tools for patient activation. Design and implementation issues (eg, technical, organizational, information security) are substantial and must be thoughtfully approached. Adopting standards into design can enhance the national goal of portability and interoperability.

摘要

目的

设计、构建、实施和评估与军用医疗系统绑定的个人健康记录(PHR),并根据用户偏好利用 Microsoft®HealthVault 和 Google®Health 基础设施。

材料与方法

2008 年至 2009 年在华盛顿州塔科马市的 Madigan 陆军医疗中心进行了试点项目。我们的 PHR 架构是一个灵活的平台,该平台整合了基于文档连续性和护理连续性记录的标准模型,通过安全的退伍军人管理局数据代理,根据用户偏好将国防部来源的健康数据映射到 Microsoft®HealthVault 和 Google®Health。该项目设计和实施由提供者和患者咨询小组指导,并进行了正式的用户评估。

结果

试点项目包括 250 名受益用户。大约 73.2%的用户年龄<65 岁,38.4%为女性。在这些用户中,有 169 人(67.6%)选择了 Microsoft®HealthVault,81 人(32.4%)选择了 Google®Health 作为他们首选的 PHR。对用户的抽样评估反映出 100%(n=60)对记录访问的便利性感到满意,91.7%(n=55)对 PHR 的整体功能感到满意。

讨论

与数据传输决策(推式与拉式)、故意延迟报告敏感信息、理解和映射 PHR 使用和临床工作流程以及患者可能选择与提供者共享信息的决策相关的关键经验教训。

结论

目前,PHR 被视为增强患者激活能力的工具。设计和实施问题(例如技术、组织、信息安全)非常重要,必须认真对待。将标准纳入设计可以增强国家的可移植性和互操作性目标。