Suppr超能文献

初级保健中绑定式个人健康记录的传播与应用

Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.

作者信息

Vydra Taylor Pressler, Cuaresma Edward, Kretovics Matthew, Bose-Brill Seuli

机构信息

Aver Informatics Inc. in Columbus, OH.

Ohio State University College of Medicine in Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 1;12(Spring):1c. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Personal health records (PHRs) enable patients to access their healthcare information in a secure environment, increasing patient engagement in medical care. PHRs can be tethered to a patient's electronic health record (EHR). Tethered PHRs, also known as patient portals, allow patients to access relevant medical information from their provider. Despite recent policy efforts to promote the use of health information technology and increased availability of PHRs in the clinical setting, PHR adoption rates remain relatively low overall. This article examines physician characteristics of high vs. low PHR adopters.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to (1) examine PHR use patterns in the primary care setting, (2) identify physician characteristics affecting PHR adoption, and (3) explore physician perspectives encouraging and deterring use.

METHODS

Information technology records provided data on primary care patient portal use at a large Midwestern academic medical center. Electronic surveys were administered to affiliated primary care physicians to measure their perceived use of patient portals. A focus group consisting of physician providers who completed the survey was used to further elucidate the trends and perceived utilization of the patient portal in the clinical setting.

RESULTS

While they expended significant time communicating with patients using the portal, physicians generally overestimated the time spent per week on the system. Physicians who had been in practice longer estimated a higher average time spent on the system when compared to newer physicians. Patient portal activation rates and use decreased with increased years in practice. During the focus groups, physicians voiced motivation to use patient portals because they perceived improved patient communication and satisfaction with use. However, continued lack of reimbursement for time spent in portal communication was reported as a major barrier to providers' engagement with this technology.

DISCUSSION

Physician endorsement and engagement is critical to achieve widespread adoption of PHRs. Such endorsement can be obtained through (1) providing rewards from health system employers for high use of PHRs, (2) providing financial reimbursement for time spent electronically communicating with patients via the PHR from federal initiatives incentivizing meaningful use of health information technology, (3) building robust support staff assistance for PHR communication into primary care workflows, and (4) integrating more PHR-specific education into providers' EHR training.

摘要

背景

个人健康记录(PHR)使患者能够在安全的环境中访问自己的医疗保健信息,从而提高患者对医疗护理的参与度。PHR可以与患者的电子健康记录(EHR)相连。与EHR相连的PHR,也称为患者门户,允许患者从其医疗服务提供者那里访问相关医疗信息。尽管最近出台了政策推动健康信息技术的使用,且临床环境中PHR的可用性有所提高,但总体而言,PHR的采用率仍然相对较低。本文研究了高PHR采用者与低PHR采用者的医生特征。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)研究初级保健环境中PHR的使用模式;(2)确定影响PHR采用的医生特征;(3)探讨鼓励和阻碍使用PHR的医生观点。

方法

信息技术记录提供了中西部一家大型学术医疗中心初级保健患者门户使用情况的数据。对附属初级保健医生进行电子调查,以衡量他们对患者门户的感知使用情况。一个由完成调查的医生组成的焦点小组被用来进一步阐明患者门户在临床环境中的使用趋势和感知利用率。

结果

虽然医生们花费大量时间通过门户与患者沟通,但他们通常高估了每周在该系统上花费的时间。与新医生相比,从业时间较长的医生估计在该系统上花费的平均时间更高。患者门户激活率和使用率随着从业年限的增加而下降。在焦点小组讨论中,医生们表示有使用患者门户的动机,因为他们认为这改善了与患者的沟通并提高了使用满意度。然而,据报告,在门户沟通中花费的时间持续缺乏报销是医疗服务提供者使用这项技术的主要障碍。

讨论

医生的认可和参与对于实现PHR的广泛采用至关重要。可以通过以下方式获得这种认可:(1)由医疗系统雇主对高PHR使用率给予奖励;(2)从联邦激励健康信息技术有意义使用的举措中,为通过PHR与患者进行电子沟通所花费的时间提供经济补偿;(3)在初级保健工作流程中为PHR沟通建立强大的支持人员协助机制;(4)将更多特定于PHR的教育纳入医疗服务提供者的EHR培训中。

相似文献

1
Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 1;12(Spring):1c. eCollection 2015.
2
Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4973.
5
Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Oct 6;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-45.
8
Effect on VA Patient Satisfaction of Provider's Use of an Integrated Viewer of Multiple Electronic Health Records.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):132-136. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4708-z. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Family physician perceptions of personal health records.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010 Jan 1;7(Winter):1d.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing patients' willingness to share their digital health data for primary and secondary use: A theory- and evidence-based overview of reviews.
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 30;11:20552076251340254. doi: 10.1177/20552076251340254. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
3
Personal Health Record implementation in rural primary care: A descriptive exploratory study using RE-AIM framework.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jun 26;3(6):e0000537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000537. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
A Patient-Centered Approach to Writing Ambulatory Visit Notes in the Cures Act Era.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):199-204. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761436. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Electronic Medical Record-Based Electronic Messaging Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/a-2004-6669. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
7
Multiple Sclerosis and MyChart Messaging: A Retrospective Chart Review Evaluating Its Use.
Int J MS Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;24(6):271-274. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2020-101. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
8
Factors Associated with Reducing Disparities in Electronic Personal Heath Records Use Among Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic Adults.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Jun;10(3):1201-1211. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01307-5. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: testing an integrated theoretical model.
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
2
How patients want to engage with their personal health record: a qualitative study.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 30;3(7):e002931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002931.
3
Factors influencing family physician adoption of electronic health records (EHRs).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):388-93. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120351.
5
Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2324-x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Personal health records: meaningful use, but for whom?
Mt Sinai J Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;79(5):593-602. doi: 10.1002/msj.21334.
8
Integrated personal health record use: association with parent-reported care experiences.
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e183-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1786. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
9
The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):420-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1889-0. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
10
Personal health records: a scoping review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):515-22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验