Department of Psychological Medicine and Neurology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;199(1):49-56. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083840. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Bipolar disorder is complex and can be difficult to diagnose. It is often misdiagnosed as recurrent major depressive disorder.
We had three main aims. To estimate the proportion of primary care patients with a working diagnosis of unipolar depression who satisfy DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder. To test two screening instruments for bipolar disorder (the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) and Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS)) within a primary care sample. To assess whether individuals with major depressive disorder with subthreshold manic symptoms differ from those individuals with major depressive disorder but with no or little history of manic symptoms in terms of clinical course, psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Two-phase screening study in primary care.
Three estimates of the prevalence of undiagnosed bipolar disorder were obtained: 21.6%, 9.6% and 3.3%. The HCL-32 and BSDS questionnaires had quite low positive predictive values (50.0 and 30.1% respectively). Participants with major depressive disorder and with a history of subthreshold manic symptoms differed from those participants with no or little history of manic symptoms on several clinical features and on measures of both psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Between 3.3 and 21.6% of primary care patients with unipolar depression may have an undiagnosed bipolar disorder. The HCL-32 and BSDS screening questionnaires may be more useful for detecting broader definitions of bipolar disorder than DSM-IV-defined bipolar disorder. Subdiagnostic features of bipolar disorder are relatively common in primary care patients with unipolar depression and are associated with a more morbid course of illness. Future classifications of recurrent depression should include dimensional measures of bipolar symptoms.
双相情感障碍较为复杂,诊断难度较大,常被误诊为复发性重度抑郁症。
我们有三个主要目标。首先,评估初级保健患者中,有工作诊断为单相抑郁但符合 DSM-IV 双相障碍诊断标准的患者比例。其次,在初级保健样本中测试两种双相障碍筛查工具(躁狂清单-32 项(HCL-32)和双相谱诊断量表(BSDS))。最后,评估亚临床躁狂症状是否会使伴有或不伴有轻躁狂症状的重度抑郁障碍患者在临床病程、心理社会功能和生活质量方面存在差异。
初级保健中进行两阶段筛查研究。
获得了三种未确诊双相障碍患病率的估计值:21.6%、9.6%和 3.3%。HCL-32 和 BSDS 问卷的阳性预测值均较低(分别为 50.0%和 30.1%)。伴有亚临床躁狂症状的重度抑郁障碍患者与无或很少有躁狂症状史的患者在多个临床特征以及心理社会功能和生活质量的测量方面存在差异。
在初级保健中,有 3.3%至 21.6%的单相抑郁患者可能患有未确诊的双相障碍。HCL-32 和 BSDS 筛查问卷可能比 DSM-IV 定义的双相障碍更能用于检测更广泛的双相障碍定义。在单相抑郁的初级保健患者中,双相障碍的亚诊断特征较为常见,且与更严重的疾病病程相关。未来的复发性抑郁分类应包括双相症状的维度测量。