Suppr超能文献

通过TEMPS-A简版区分重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍中的情感气质特征:使用潜在类别分析的横断面研究

Distinguishing Affective Temperament Profiles in Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Through the Short Version of TEMPS-A: Cross-Sectional Study Using Latent Profile Analysis.

作者信息

Jang Ha Lim, Lee Chanhui, Yu Hyeona, Lee Daseul, Lee Hyuk Joon, Ha Tae Hyon, Kang Hyo Shin, Myung Woojae, Park Jungkyu

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):601-609. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0444. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to elucidate the distinct response patterns exhibited by patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) and those with major depressive disorder (MDD) through the application of the short version of the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A-SV).

METHODS

A total of 2,458 participants consisting of patients with MDD (n=288), BD (BD I, n=111; BD II, n=427), and control group (n=1,632) completed the TEMPS-A-SV. The response patterns of the participants were classified into distinct profiles using latent profile analysis. The study further examined the impact of covariates such as age, sex, and diagnostic group on derived latent profile memberships.

RESULTS

The following three latent profiles were identified: High Affective Temperament Group (17.86%), Low Affective Temperament Group (41.25%), and Middle Affective Temperament Group (40.89%). Compared with the patient group with MDD and BD, the control group was more likely to belong in the Low Affective Temperament Group, which showed a higher score on hyperthymic temperament than the Middle Affective Temperament Group. Furthermore, compared with the patients with BD, the MDD patients were more likely to be in the Low Affective Temperament Group rather than the Middle Affective Temperament Group.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that different affective temperaments exist between patients with MDD and BD. Attempting to classify response patterns using the TEMPS-A-SV can help diagnose MDD and BD correctly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过应用孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥自陈问卷气质评估简版(TEMPS-A-SV),阐明双相情感障碍(BD)患者和重度抑郁症(MDD)患者表现出的不同反应模式。

方法

共有2458名参与者,包括MDD患者(n = 288)、BD患者(BD I,n = 111;BD II,n = 427)和对照组(n = 1632)完成了TEMPS-A-SV。使用潜在类别分析将参与者的反应模式分类为不同的类别。该研究进一步考察了年龄、性别和诊断组等协变量对导出的潜在类别归属的影响。

结果

确定了以下三种潜在类别:高情感气质组(17.86%)、低情感气质组(41.25%)和中情感气质组(40.89%)。与MDD和BD患者组相比,对照组更有可能属于低情感气质组,该组在轻躁狂气质方面的得分高于中情感气质组。此外,与BD患者相比,MDD患者更有可能属于低情感气质组而非中情感气质组。

结论

这些结果表明,MDD患者和BD患者之间存在不同的情感气质。尝试使用TEMPS-A-SV对反应模式进行分类有助于正确诊断MDD和BD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2cc/11222074/47b6ec3861ae/pi-2023-0444f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验