Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Springfield, IL.
West J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;11(5):486-90.
Faculty often evaluate learners in the emergency department (ED) at the end of each shift. In contrast, learners usually evaluate faculty only at the end of a rotation. In December 2007 Southern Illinois University School of Medicine changed its evaluation process, requiring ED trainees to complete end-of-shift evaluations of faculty.
Determine the feasibility and acceptance of end-of-shift evaluations for emergency medicine faculty.
We conducted this one-year observational study at two hospitals with 120,000 combined annual ED visits. Trainees (residents and students) anonymously completed seven-item shift evaluations and placed them in a locked box. Trainees and faculty completed a survey about the new process.
During the study, trainees were assigned 699 shifts, and 633 end-of-shift evaluations were collected for a completion rate of 91%. The median number of ratings per faculty was 31, and the median number of comments was 11 for each faculty. The survey was completed by 16/22 (73%) faculty and 41/69 (59%) trainees. A majority of faculty (86%) and trainees (76%) felt comfortable being evaluated at end-of-shift. No trainees felt it was a time burden.
Evaluating faculty following an ED shift is feasible. End-of-shift faculty evaluations are accepted by trainees and faculty.
教师通常在每个班次结束时对急诊部(ED)的学员进行评估。相比之下,学员通常仅在轮转结束时才对教师进行评估。2007 年 12 月,南伊利诺伊大学医学院改变了其评估流程,要求 ED 学员在班次结束时对教师进行评估。
确定对急诊医学教师进行班次结束时评估的可行性和可接受性。
我们在两家拥有 120000 例年度急诊就诊量的医院进行了为期一年的观察性研究。学员(住院医师和医学生)匿名填写了七项班次评估,并将其放入一个上锁的盒子中。学员和教师完成了一份关于新流程的调查问卷。
在研究期间,学员被分配了 699 个班次,共收集到 633 份班次结束时的评估,完成率为 91%。每位教师的平均评分数为 31 分,每位教师的平均评论数为 11 条。共有 16/22(73%)位教师和 41/69(59%)位学员完成了调查问卷。大多数教师(86%)和学员(76%)认为在班次结束时接受评估感到自在。没有学员认为这是一种时间负担。
在 ED 班次结束后评估教师是可行的。班次结束时的教师评估得到了学员和教师的认可。