Sritipsukho Paskorn, Thaweekul Yuthadej
Postgraduate Studies Program, Faculty ofMedicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Dec;93 Suppl 7:S254-61.
To systematically review the performance characteristics of VIA in cervical cancer screening.
The Ovid (Medline) electronic database from January, 1996 to Febuary, 2007 was searched, using the following key search words of (1) MESH term "Uterine Cervical Neoplasms" with subheading "diagnosis", (2) Keywords "sensitivity" or "specificity" and (3) Keyword "visual inspection with acetic acid" Total of 11 studies were relevant and eligible for the review. Histology or combination of Colposcopy and histology were used as gold standard. Abnormal colposcopy must have histological confirmation by material obtained by colposcopic directed biopsy, loop excision, or endocervical curettage. Histologic threshold for positive outcome from screening tests was CIN2 (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2) or higher (or equivalent categories by other classifications). A meta-analysis, yielding a quantitative summary measure was implemented with the random effect model.
Using random effect method, the pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of VIA-VIAM were 71.8%, 79.4%, 16.7% and 99.0% respectively. When comparing with conventional cytology, VIA have favorably characteristics especially sensitivity and negative predictive value.
VIA may be incorporated in cervical cancer screening programme in low resource setting country because of high negative predictive value of the test is sufficiently high to assure screening for negative and CIN I women.
系统评价醋酸肉眼观察法(VIA)在宫颈癌筛查中的性能特征。
检索1996年1月至2007年2月的Ovid(Medline)电子数据库,使用以下关键检索词:(1)主题词“子宫颈肿瘤”及副标题“诊断”;(2)关键词“敏感性”或“特异性”;(3)关键词“醋酸肉眼观察”。共有11项研究相关且符合纳入综述的标准。组织学或阴道镜检查与组织学联合检查用作金标准。异常阴道镜检查结果必须通过阴道镜引导活检、环形切除术或宫颈管刮除术获取的材料进行组织学确认。筛查试验阳性结果的组织学阈值为宫颈上皮内瘤变2级(CIN2)或更高(或其他分类中的等效类别)。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,得出定量汇总指标。
采用随机效应方法,VIA-VIAM的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值的合并估计值分别为71.8%、79.4%、16.7%和99.0%。与传统细胞学检查相比,VIA具有良好的特征,尤其是敏感性和阴性预测值。
由于该检测的高阴性预测值足以确保对阴性和CIN I级女性进行筛查,VIA可纳入资源匮乏国家的宫颈癌筛查项目。