Bouwmeester Sjoerd, van Hellemond Irene E G, Maynard Charles, Young Dwayne, Bethea Charles, Gorgels Anton, Wagner Galen S
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Electrocardiol. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Several ST segment deviation scores have been developed to estimate the myocardial area at risk (AAR) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which can be used to measure the effectiveness of reperfusion therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess whether one of these ST segment deviation scores (the Aldrich score) is sufficiently stable between the electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded in the ambulance (ECG 1) and the ECG recorded at the time of admission to the hospital (ECG 2) to be used as a baseline estimation of the AAR.
The Aldrich scores were compared between ECG 1 and ECG 2 in 77 patients who met the criteria for ST elevation myocardial infarction. The ECGs had a time interval of at least 5 minutes and were recorded before reperfusion therapy. Sufficiently stable was defined as 95% of the patients did not show a temporal change of the Aldrich score of more than 4.5%.
The mean time interval between ECG 1 and ECG 2 was 20 ± 9 minutes. Forty-three percent of the total study population showed an "unstable Aldrich score" between ECG 1 and ECG 2. Fifty-seven percent showed a "stable Aldrich score", which means that the 95% standard for sufficiently stable was not fulfilled. By dividing the population based on infarct location, the group with inferior AMI (n = 43) showed more stability (67%) than the group with anterior AMI (n = 34) (44%) (P < .05). However, this remains less than the 95% stability standard.
For both inferior and anterior AMI locations, the Aldrich score was not sufficiently stable to be used as a reliable baseline estimation of the AAR in AMI.
已经开发了几种ST段偏移评分来估计急性心肌梗死(AMI)期间的心肌梗死面积(AAR),其可用于衡量再灌注治疗的效果。本研究的目的是评估这些ST段偏移评分之一(奥尔德里奇评分)在救护车记录的心电图(ECG 1)和入院时记录的心电图(ECG 2)之间是否足够稳定,以用作AAR的基线估计。
比较了77例符合ST段抬高型心肌梗死标准患者的ECG 1和ECG 2的奥尔德里奇评分。心电图的时间间隔至少为5分钟,且在再灌注治疗前记录。足够稳定的定义为95%的患者奥尔德里奇评分的时间变化不超过4.5%。
ECG 1和ECG 2之间的平均时间间隔为20±9分钟。在整个研究人群中,43%的患者在ECG 1和ECG 2之间显示出“不稳定的奥尔德里奇评分”。57%的患者显示出“稳定的奥尔德里奇评分”,这意味着未达到足够稳定的95%标准。根据梗死部位对人群进行划分,下壁AMI组(n = 43)比前壁AMI组(n = 34)表现出更高的稳定性(67%对44%)(P <.05)。然而,这仍低于95%的稳定性标准。
对于下壁和前壁AMI部位,奥尔德里奇评分均不够稳定,不能用作AMI中AAR的可靠基线估计。