Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.09.019.
There is currently limited information available in the orthopaedic surgery literature regarding the appropriate management of symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of all published literature pertaining to the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Inclusion criteria were all studies that reported clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of both articular-sided and bursal-sided lesions using a validated outcome scoring system and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Data abstracted from the selected studies included tear type and location (articular v bursal sided), treatment approach, postoperative rehabilitation protocol, outcome scores, patient satisfaction, and postoperative imaging results.
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for the final analysis. Seven of the studies treated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with debridement with or without an associated subacromial decompression, 3 performed a takedown and repair, 5 used a transtendon repair technique, and 1 used a transosseous repair method. Among the 16 studies reviewed, excellent postoperative outcomes were reported in 28.7% to 93% of patients treated. In all 12 studies with available preoperative baseline data, treatment resulted in significant improvement in shoulder symptoms and function. For high-grade lesions, the data support arthroscopic takedown and repair, transtendon repairs, and transosseous repairs, with all 3 techniques providing a high percentage of excellent results. Debridement of partial-thickness tears of less than 50% of the tendon's thickness with or without a concomitant acromioplasty also results in good to excellent surgical outcomes; however, a 6.5% to 34.6% incidence of progression to full-thickness tears is present.
This systematic review of 16 clinical studies showed that significant variation is present in the results obtained after the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. What can be supported by the available data is that tears that involve less than 50% of the tendon can be treated with good results by debridement of the tendon with or without a formal acromioplasty, although subsequent tear progression may occur. When the tear is greater than 50%, surgical intervention focusing on repair has been successful. There is no evidence to suggest a differential in outcome for tear completion and repair versus transtendon repair of these lesions because both methods have been shown to result in favorable outcomes.
Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.
在矫形外科文献中,关于症状性部分厚度肩袖撕裂的适当治疗方法,目前信息有限。
在 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中,对所有关于关节镜下治疗部分厚度肩袖撕裂的已发表文献进行了系统检索。纳入标准为所有报告了关节镜治疗关节侧和滑囊侧病变后临床结果的研究,采用了经过验证的评分系统,并至少随访 12 个月。从选定的研究中提取的数据包括撕裂类型和位置(关节侧与滑囊侧)、治疗方法、术后康复方案、评分结果、患者满意度和术后影像学结果。
符合纳入标准的研究有 16 项,最终纳入 16 项研究进行分析。其中 7 项研究采用清创术治疗部分厚度肩袖撕裂,伴或不伴肩峰下减压;3 项研究采用切开修复术;5 项研究采用腱下修复技术;1 项研究采用经骨修复方法。在回顾的 16 项研究中,28.7%至 93%的患者术后效果良好。在所有 12 项具有术前基线数据的研究中,治疗均显著改善了肩部症状和功能。对于高级别病变,数据支持关节镜下切开修复、腱下修复和经骨修复,所有 3 种技术均能提供高比例的良好效果。对于厚度小于 50%的部分厚度肩袖撕裂,行清创术联合或不联合肩峰成形术也能获得良好至优秀的手术效果;然而,仍有 6.5%至 34.6%的撕裂进展为全厚度撕裂。
对 16 项临床研究的系统评价显示,关节镜治疗部分厚度肩袖撕裂的结果存在显著差异。现有数据支持的是,对于厚度小于 50%的撕裂,可以通过肌腱清创术(伴或不伴正式的肩峰成形术)进行治疗,结果良好,但随后可能会出现撕裂进展。当撕裂大于 50%时,以修复为重点的手术干预已取得成功。没有证据表明这些病变的完全撕裂和修复与腱下修复的结果存在差异,因为这两种方法都已显示出良好的效果。
四级,对四级研究的系统评价。