Suppr超能文献

关节镜修复部分厚度肩袖撕裂的改善结果:系统评价。

Improved outcomes with arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes-based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.

Department for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):113-124. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4564-0. Epub 2017 May 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimum treatment strategy for the surgical management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) is evolving. In this study, two research questions were sought to be answered: "Does the repair technique for PTRCTs involving >50% of the tendon thickness have an effect on structural and functional outcomes of arthroscopic repair?" and "Is there a difference in outcomes of arthroscopically treated articular- and bursal-sided PTRCTs?".

METHODS

A systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted to identify all literature published reporting on outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of PTRCTs classified with the Ellman classification with minimum 2-year follow-up. Prospective randomized trials were eligible for quantitative synthesis. A total of 19 studies, published between 1999 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. Two studies reporting outcomes of articular-sided PTRCTs with prospective randomized study design were included in quantitative synthesis calculations.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs >50% thickness results in significant pain relief and good to excellent functional outcomes. When in situ repair was compared with repair of the tendon after completion to full-thickness RCT, there were no significant differences in functional or structural outcomes or complication rates. The best treatment method for low-grade PTRCTs remains unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

The repair technique (in situ repair versus repair of the tendon after completion to full-thickness RCT) did not significantly affect the outcomes for arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs >50% thickness. The current literature contains evidence for inferior outcomes and higher failure rates after arthroscopic debridement of bursal-sided compared to articular-sided PTRCTs, and some evidence suggests that repair of lower-grade bursal-sided tears may be beneficial over debridement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

部分厚度肩袖撕裂(PTRCT)的手术治疗策略正在不断发展。本研究旨在回答两个问题:“对于肌腱厚度大于 50%的 PTRCT,修复技术是否会影响关节镜修复的结构和功能结果?”以及“关节镜治疗关节侧和滑囊侧 PTRCT 的结果是否存在差异?”。

方法

根据 PRISMA 声明进行系统评价,以确定所有报告关节镜治疗 PTRCT 结果的文献,这些 PTRCT 根据 Ellman 分类进行分类,随访时间至少为 2 年。前瞻性随机试验有资格进行定量综合分析。共有 19 项研究符合本系统评价的纳入标准,这些研究发表于 1999 年至 2015 年之间。有 2 项研究报告了前瞻性随机设计的关节侧 PTRCT 的结果,纳入了定量综合分析计算。

结果

关节镜治疗肌腱厚度大于 50%的 PTRCT 可显著缓解疼痛,功能结果良好至优秀。当原位修复与完成全厚度 RCT 后修复肌腱进行比较时,在功能或结构结果或并发症发生率方面没有显著差异。对于低级别 PTRCT 的最佳治疗方法仍不清楚。

结论

修复技术(原位修复与完成全厚度 RCT 后修复肌腱)并未显著影响关节镜治疗肌腱厚度大于 50%的 PTRCT 的结果。目前的文献证据表明,与关节侧 PTRCT 相比,关节镜下滑囊侧 PTRCT 的清创术结果较差,失败率较高,一些证据表明,与清创术相比,修复较低级别滑囊侧撕裂可能更有益。

证据水平

IV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验