Beijing Center for Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Vaccine. 2011 Mar 24;29(15):2679-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.053. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
To provide basis for human rabies vaccination in China, the safety and immunogenicity of two freeze-dried Vero cell rabies vaccines for human use were assessed. A total of 250 volunteers were enrolled and divided into two groups: volunteers in Group A (n=200) were vaccinated five doses of Speeda Vero cell rabies vaccine manufactured by Liaoning Chengda Biotechnology Co. Ltd. on day 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 after exposure. Volunteers in Group B (n=50) were treated with Verorab Vero cell rabies vaccine manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur on the same schedule. The local and systematic adverse reactions were observed. Serum neutralizing antibody levels of 80 individuals in Group A and 50 individuals in Group B were tested with RFFIT on day 7, 14, 45, 180, 360 after the first dose. The seroconversion rates in Groups A and B were 40.3% and 37.0% on day 7 after the first dose, 95.5% and 97.7% on day 14, 100% and 100% on day 45, 100% and 100% on day 180, 89.1% and 89.5% on day 360 respectively, indicating no significant differences between the two groups. And no significant differences were found between the neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the two groups on day 7, 14, 45, 180 and 360 after the first dose, with the GMTs of day 14, 45, 180 and 360 all higher than 0.5IU/ml. Antibody levels of the two groups peaked around 2 weeks after the full vaccination program, followed by a 55% decrease up to day 180 and another 76% decrease up to day 360. Both groups experienced occasions of transient fever, rash, edema, and scleroma after vaccination. Neither group had any severe adverse reactions. It was concluded that both vaccines showed satisfactory safety and immunogenicity. Booster vaccination is recommended following another exposure after six months since the full vaccination program.
为了为人用狂犬病疫苗在中国的使用提供依据,评估了两种冻干vero 细胞狂犬病疫苗在人体中的安全性和免疫原性。共招募了 250 名志愿者,并将其分为两组:A 组(n=200)志愿者在暴露后第 0、3、7、14、28 天分别接种 5 剂辽宁成大生物技术有限公司生产的 Speeda Vero 细胞狂犬病疫苗。B 组(n=50)志愿者按照相同的时间表使用赛诺菲巴斯德生产的 Verorab Vero 细胞狂犬病疫苗。观察两组的局部和全身不良反应。在第 1 剂后第 7、14、45、180、360 天,检测 A 组 80 名个体和 B 组 50 名个体的血清中和抗体水平。第 1 剂后第 7 天,A 组和 B 组的血清转化率分别为 40.3%和 37.0%,第 14 天分别为 95.5%和 97.7%,第 45 天分别为 100%和 100%,第 180 天分别为 100%和 100%,第 360 天分别为 89.1%和 89.5%,两组之间无显著性差异。两组在第 1 剂后第 7、14、45、180 和 360 天的中和抗体几何平均滴度(GMT)无显著性差异,第 14、45、180 和 360 天的 GMT 均高于 0.5IU/ml。两组的抗体水平在全程免疫程序后约 2 周达到峰值,随后在第 180 天下降 55%,在第 360 天下降 76%。两组在接种后均有一过性发热、皮疹、水肿、硬结等情况。两组均无严重不良反应。两种疫苗均表现出良好的安全性和免疫原性。建议全程免疫程序完成后 6 个月再次暴露时进行加强免疫。