Shi Nianmin, Zhang Yibin, Zheng Huizhen, Zhu Zhenggang, Wang Dingming, Li Sihai, Li Yuhua, Yang Liqing, Zhang Junnan, Bai Yunhua, Lu Qiang, Zhang Zheng, Luo Fengji, Yu Chun, Li Li
a Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Beijing , P.R. China.
b Liaoning Chengda biological Limited by Share Ltd , Shenyang , P.R. China.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jun 3;13(6):1-8. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1279770. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
To compare the safety, immunogenicity and long-term effect of a purified vero cell cultured rabies vaccine in post-exposure subjects following 2 intramuscular regimens, Zagreb or Essen regimen.
Serum samples were collected before vaccination and on days 7, 14, 42, 180 and 365 post vaccination. Solicited adverse events were recorded for 7 d following each vaccine dose, and unsolicited adverse events throughout the entire study period. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01821911 and NCT01827917).
No serious adverse events were reported. Although Zagreb regimen had a higher incidence of adverse reactions than Essen regimen at the first and second injection, the incidence was similar at the third and fourth injection between these 2 groups as well. At day 42, 100% subjects developed adequate rabies virus neutralizing antibody concentrations (≥ 0.5IU/ml) for both regimens. At days 180 and 365, the antibody level decreased dramatically, however, the percentage of subjects with adequate antibody concentrations still remained high (above 75% and 50% respectively). None of confirmed rabies virus exposured subjects had rabies one year later, and percentage of subjects with adequate antibody concentrations reached 100% at days 14 and 42.
Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis vaccination with PVRV following a Zagreb regimen had a similar safety, immunogenicity and long-term effect to the Essen regimen in China.
比较纯化的 vero 细胞培养狂犬病疫苗在采用两种肌肉注射方案(萨格勒布方案或埃森方案)进行暴露后预防接种的受试者中的安全性、免疫原性及长期效果。
在接种疫苗前以及接种后第 7、14、42、180 和 365 天采集血清样本。记录每次疫苗接种后 7 天内的主动报告不良事件以及整个研究期间的被动报告不良事件。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT01821911 和 NCT01827917)。
未报告严重不良事件。虽然萨格勒布方案在首次和第二次注射时不良反应发生率高于埃森方案,但两组在第三次和第四次注射时的发生率相似。在第 42 天,两种方案的所有受试者均产生了足够的狂犬病病毒中和抗体浓度(≥0.5IU/ml)。在第 180 天和第 365 天,抗体水平显著下降,然而,抗体浓度足够的受试者百分比仍然很高(分别高于 75%和 50%)。一年后,所有确诊的狂犬病病毒暴露受试者均未发生狂犬病,且在第 14 天和第 42 天抗体浓度足够的受试者百分比达到 100%。
在中国,采用萨格勒布方案进行狂犬病暴露后预防接种的纯化 vero 细胞狂犬病疫苗(PVRV)与埃森方案具有相似的安全性、免疫原性和长期效果。