Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Seville, Spain.
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 21;6(1):e14569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014569.
Knowledge about how frugivory and seed deposition are spatially distributed is valuable to understand the role of dispersers on the structure and dynamics of plant populations. This may be particularly important within anthropogenic areas, where either the patchy distribution of wild plants or the presence of cultivated fleshy-fruits may influence plant-disperser interactions.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated frugivory and spatial patterns of seed deposition by carnivorous mammals in anthropogenic landscapes considering two spatial scales: 'landscape' (∼10 km(2)) and 'habitat type' (∼1-2 km(2)). We sampled carnivore faeces and plant abundance at three contrasting habitats (chestnut woods, mosaics and scrublands), each replicated within three different landscapes. Sixty-five percent of faeces collected (n = 1077) contained seeds, among which wild and cultivated seeds appeared in similar proportions (58% and 53%) despite that cultivated fruiting plants were much less abundant. Seed deposition was spatially structured among both spatial scales being different between fruit types. Whereas the most important source of spatial variation in deposition of wild seeds was the landscape scale, it was the habitat scale for cultivated seeds. At the habitat scale, seeds of wild species were mostly deposited within mosaics while seeds of cultivated species were within chestnut woods and scrublands. Spatial concordance between seed deposition and plant abundance was found only for wild species.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Spatial patterns of seed deposition by carnivores differed between fruit types and seemed to be modulated by the fleshy-fruited plant assemblages and the behaviour of dispersers. Our results suggest that a strong preference for cultivated fruits by carnivores may influence their spatial foraging behaviour and lower their dispersal services to wild species. However, the high amount of seeds removed within and between habitats suggests that carnivores must play an important role--often overlooked--as 'restorers' and 'habitat shapers' in anthropogenic areas.
了解果实被取食和种子散布的空间分布情况对于理解散布者在植物种群的结构和动态中的作用很有价值。在人为活动区域,这种了解可能尤为重要,因为野生植物呈斑块状分布,或者肉质果实的栽培植物的存在,可能会影响植物与散布者之间的相互作用。
方法/主要发现:我们在人为景观中,从两个空间尺度调查了肉食哺乳动物的果实取食和种子散布的空间模式:“景观”(约 10km2)和“生境类型”(约 1-2km2)。我们在三个不同的景观中,每个景观都有三种不同的生境类型(栗树林、镶嵌地和灌丛地),在每个生境类型中进行了三次复制采样,收集肉食哺乳动物粪便和植物丰度。收集到的粪便中,有 65%(n=1077)含有种子,其中野生和栽培种子的比例相似(分别为 58%和 53%),尽管栽培果实植物的丰度要低得多。种子散布在两个空间尺度上都存在空间结构,并且不同果实类型的散布存在差异。虽然在野生种子的沉积中,景观尺度是空间变化的最重要来源,但对于栽培种子来说,是生境尺度。在生境尺度上,野生植物的种子主要散布在镶嵌地中,而栽培植物的种子则散布在栗树林和灌丛地中。仅在野生物种中发现种子沉积与植物丰度之间存在空间一致性。
结论/意义:肉食动物对种子的散布模式因果实类型而异,似乎受到肉质果实植物组合和散布者行为的调节。我们的研究结果表明,肉食动物对栽培果实的强烈偏好可能会影响其空间觅食行为,并降低其对野生物种的扩散服务。然而,在生境内部和之间移走的种子数量较多,表明肉食动物必须在人为活动区域发挥重要作用——这一作用常常被忽视——充当“恢复者”和“生境塑造者”。