Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos C/Tulipán s/n Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;3(11):3751-63. doi: 10.1002/ece3.753. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Seed dispersal is typically performed by a diverse array of species assemblages with different behavioral and morphological traits which determine dispersal quality (DQ, defined as the probability of recruitment of a dispersed seed). Fate of ecosystems to ongoing environmental changes is critically dependent on dispersal and mainly on DQ in novel scenarios. We assess here the DQ, thus the multiplicative effect of germination and survival probability to the first 3 years of life, for seeds dispersed by several bird species (Turdus spp.) and carnivores (Vulpes vulpes, Martes foina) in mature woodland remnants of Spanish juniper (Juniperus thurifera) and old fields which are being colonized by this species. Results showed that DQ was similar in mature woodlands and old fields. Germination rate for seeds dispersed by carnivores (11.5%) and thrushes (9.12%) was similar, however, interacted with microhabitat suitability. Seeds dispersed by carnivores reach the maximum germination rate on shrubs (16%), whereas seeds dispersed by thrushes did on female juniper canopies (15.5) indicating that each group of dispersers performed a directed dispersal. This directional effect was diluted when survival probability was considered: thrushes selected smaller seeds which had higher mortality in the seedling stage (70%) in relation to seedlings dispersed by carnivores (40%). Overall, thrushes resulted low-quality dispersers which provided a probability or recruitment of 2.5%, while a seed dispersed by carnivores had a probability of recruitment of 6.5%. Our findings show that generalist dispersers (i.e., carnivores) can provide a higher probability of recruitment than specialized dispersers (i.e., Turdus spp.). However, generalist species are usually opportunistic dispersers as their role as seed dispersers is dependent on the availability of trophic resources and species feeding preferences. As a result, J. thurifera dispersal community is composed by two functional groups of dispersers: specialized low-quality but trustworthy dispersers and generalist high-quality but opportunistic dispersers. The maintenance of both, generalist and specialist dispersers, in the dispersal assemblage community assures the dispersal services and increases the opportunities for regeneration and colonization of degraded areas under a land-use change scenario.
种子传播通常由具有不同行为和形态特征的多种物种组合完成,这些特征决定了传播质量(DQ,定义为分散种子的招募概率)。生态系统在持续的环境变化下的命运,主要取决于传播,特别是在新情景下的 DQ。我们在这里评估 DQ,即种子萌发和生存概率在生命的前 3 年的倍增效应,这些种子是由几种鸟类(Turdus spp.)和食肉动物(Vulpes vulpes,Martes foina)传播的,传播的地点是西班牙刺柏(Juniperus thurifera)的成熟林地遗迹和正在被该物种殖民的旧田地。结果表明,成熟林和旧田地的 DQ 相似。食肉动物(11.5%)和画眉(9.12%)传播的种子的萌发率相似,但与微生境适宜性相互作用。食肉动物传播的种子在灌木上达到最大萌发率(16%),而画眉传播的种子在雌性刺柏树冠上达到最大萌发率(15.5%),这表明每一组传播者都进行了有针对性的传播。当考虑生存概率时,这种定向效应会被稀释:画眉选择较小的种子,这些种子在幼苗阶段的死亡率更高(70%),而食肉动物传播的种子的死亡率为 40%。总体而言,画眉是低质量的传播者,提供的招募概率为 2.5%,而食肉动物传播的种子的招募概率为 6.5%。我们的研究结果表明,一般传播者(即食肉动物)可以提供更高的招募概率,而专门传播者(即 Turdus spp.)则不能。然而,一般传播者通常是机会主义传播者,因为它们作为种子传播者的作用取决于营养资源的可利用性和物种的取食偏好。因此,J. thurifera 传播群落由两个功能群的传播者组成:专门的低质量但可靠的传播者和专门的高质量但机会主义的传播者。在传播集合社区中维持这两种传播者,即专门的低质量但可靠的传播者和专门的高质量但机会主义的传播者,确保了传播服务,并增加了在土地利用变化情景下退化地区再生和殖民的机会。