Ingelmo Ingelmo I, Rubio Romero R, Fàbregas Julià N, Rama-Maceiras P, Hernández-Palazón J
Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Dec;57 Suppl 2:S33-43.
When the neuroanesthesia working group of the Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor surveyed Spanish anesthesiologists to learn the degree of their involvement in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, a surprising finding was that anesthetists did not participate in endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms when the procedure was carried out in an interventional radiology department. These interventions, which are considered minimally invasive and are performed outside the operating room, are not risk-free. Based on the survey results and a systematic review of the literature, the working group has provided practice guidelines for the perioperative management of anesthesia for endovascular repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. In our opinion, the diversity of practice in the hospitals surveyed calls for the application of practice guidelines based on consensus if we are to reduce variability in clinical and anesthetic approaches as well as lower the rates of morbidity and mortality and shorten the hospital stay of patients undergoing exclusion of an aneurysm.
当西班牙麻醉、复苏与疼痛治疗学会的神经麻醉工作组对西班牙麻醉医生进行调查,以了解他们参与自发性蛛网膜下腔出血诊断和治疗的程度时,一个惊人的发现是,当颅内动脉瘤的血管内修复手术在介入放射科进行时,麻醉医生并不参与。这些被认为是微创的干预措施在手术室之外进行,但并非没有风险。基于调查结果和对文献的系统回顾,该工作组提供了破裂脑动脉瘤血管内修复术围手术期麻醉管理的实践指南。我们认为,鉴于所调查医院的实践存在多样性,如果我们要减少临床和麻醉方法的变异性,降低发病率和死亡率,并缩短接受动脉瘤排除术患者的住院时间,就需要应用基于共识的实践指南。