Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
Am Psychol. 2011 Feb-Mar;66(2):147-8; discussion 152-4. doi: 10.1037/a0021195.
Comments on the original article, "The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy," by J. Shedler (see record 2010-02208-012). Shedler summarized a large body of research that shows psychodynamic therapy to have a substantial effect size, comparable to that for many empirically supported treatments. This is an important finding, in part refuting the concerns raised by Bornstein (2001, 2002) regarding the future of psychodynamic approaches had there been no substantial changes in how practitioners and researchers approached the science to demonstrate efficacy. Further, Shedler showed that the efficacy of psychoanalytic psychotherapy is due to therapeutic methods commonly employed in cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), one of the most frequently cited empirically supported approaches for a wide range of psychological conditions. From a methodological perspective, there are some important limitations to the claim of psychodynamic psychotherapy's comparable efficacy to other empirically supported approaches.
对 J. Shedler 撰写的原始文章“精神分析动力疗法的疗效”(参见记录 2010-02208-012)的评论。Shedler 总结了大量研究,表明精神动力疗法具有显著的效果,与许多经过实证支持的治疗方法相当。这是一个重要的发现,部分反驳了 Bornstein(2001,2002)提出的关于如果从业者和研究人员在展示疗效方面没有对精神动力方法进行实质性改变,那么精神动力方法的未来将会如何的担忧。此外,Shedler 表明,精神分析心理疗法的疗效归因于认知行为疗法(CBT)中常用的治疗方法,CBT 是针对广泛心理状况的最常被引用的实证支持方法之一。从方法论的角度来看,声称精神动力疗法与其他经过实证支持的方法具有相当的疗效存在一些重要的局限性。