Leichsenring Falk, Rabung Sven, Leibing Eric
Clinic of Tiefenbrunn, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1208-16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1208.
The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy is controversial. Previous meta-analyses have reported discrepant results.
To test the efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in specific psychiatric disorders by performing a meta-analysis of more recent studies. We assessed outcomes in target problems, general psychiatric symptoms, and social functioning.
We identified studies of STPP published between January 1, 1970, and September 30, 2004, by means of a computerized search using MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and Current Contents. Rigorous inclusion criteria, included randomized controlled trials, use of treatment manuals and insurance of treatment integrity, therapists experienced or specifically trained in STPP, treatment of patients with specific psychiatric disorders, reliable and valid diagnostic measures, and data necessary to calculate effect sizes. Studies of interpersonal therapy were excluded. Seventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The information was extracted by 3 raters. Effect sizes were calculated for target problems, general psychiatric symptoms, and social functioning using the data published in the original studies. To examine the stability of outcome, we assessed effect sizes separately for end of therapy and follow-up assessment. The effect sizes of STPP were compared with those of waiting-list control patients, treatments as usual, and other forms of psychotherapy.
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy yielded significant and large pretreatment-posttreatment effect sizes for target problems (1.39), general psychiatric symptoms (0.90), and social functioning (0.80). These effect sizes were stable and tended to increase at follow-up (1.57, 0.95, and 1.19, respectively). The effect sizes of STPP significantly exceeded those of waiting-list controls and treatments as usual. No differences were found between STPP and other forms of psychotherapy.
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy proved to be an effective treatment in psychiatric disorders. However, further research of STPP in specific psychiatric disorders is needed, including a study of the active ingredients of STPP. Effectiveness studies should be included.
心理动力疗法的疗效存在争议。以往的荟萃分析报告了不一致的结果。
通过对近期研究进行荟萃分析,检验短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)对特定精神障碍的疗效。我们评估了目标问题、一般精神症状和社会功能方面的结果。
我们通过使用MEDLINE、PsychINFO和《现刊目次》进行计算机检索,确定了1970年1月1日至2004年9月30日期间发表的关于STPP的研究。严格的纳入标准包括随机对照试验、使用治疗手册以及确保治疗的完整性、治疗师有STPP经验或经过专门培训、治疗特定精神障碍患者、可靠有效的诊断措施以及计算效应大小所需的数据。人际治疗的研究被排除。17项研究符合纳入标准。由3名评分者提取信息。使用原始研究中公布的数据计算目标问题、一般精神症状和社会功能的效应大小。为了检验结果的稳定性,我们分别评估了治疗结束时和随访评估时的效应大小。将STPP的效应大小与等待名单对照患者、常规治疗以及其他形式心理治疗的效应大小进行比较。
短期心理动力心理治疗在目标问题(1.39)、一般精神症状(0.90)和社会功能(0.80)方面产生了显著且较大的治疗前至治疗后的效应大小。这些效应大小是稳定的,并且在随访时趋于增加(分别为1.57、0.95和1.19)。STPP的效应大小显著超过等待名单对照和常规治疗。STPP与其他形式心理治疗之间未发现差异。
短期心理动力心理治疗被证明是治疗精神障碍的有效方法。然而,需要对STPP在特定精神障碍中的应用进行进一步研究,包括对STPP活性成分的研究。应纳入有效性研究。