Department of Medicine, Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2011 Feb 7;194(3):135-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04196.x.
To determine the predictive value of the ABCD(2) score for early risk of stroke in Australian patients who have had transient ischaemic attack (TIA).
DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Cohort study of 512 consecutive patients with suspected TIA referred by the emergency department to the acute stroke unit (in accordance with the TIA pathway) of an urban tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, between 1 June 2004 and 30 November 2007.
Overall accuracy, estimated by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic plots (of true positive rate v false positive rate), and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios at prespecified cut-off ABCD(2) scores for stroke within 2, 7 and 90 days.
24 patients were excluded because their symptoms lasted more than 24 hours. All included patients were reviewed by a stroke physician; TIA was confirmed in 301/488 (61.7%). Most (289/301; 96.0%) had complete follow-up. Stroke occurred in 4/292 patients (1.37%; 95% CI, 0.37%-3.47%) within 2 days and 7/289 (2.42%; 95% CI, 0.98%-4.93%) within 90 days; no patient had a stroke between 2 and 7 days. The AUCs for stroke in patients with confirmed TIA were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.91) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.40-0.83) for stroke within 2 days and 90 days, respectively. At a cut-off of ≥ 5, the ABCD(2) score had modest specificity for stroke within 2 days (0.58) and 90 days (0.58), but positive predictive values (2 days, 0.03; 90 days, 0.04) and positive likelihood ratios (2 days, 2.40; 90 days, 1.71) were both poor. The score performed similarly poorly at other prespecified cut-off scores.
Given its poor predictive value, the use of the ABCD(2) score alone may not be dependable for guiding clinical treatment decisions or service organisation in an Australian tertiary setting. Validation in other Australian settings is recommended before it can be applied with confidence.
确定 ABCD(2)评分对澳大利亚短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者早期卒中风险的预测价值。
设计、参与者和地点:2004 年 6 月 1 日至 2007 年 11 月 30 日期间,维多利亚州墨尔本一家城市三级医院的急症室将疑似 TIA 的 512 例连续患者(根据 TIA 途径)转至急性卒中病房,进行队列研究。
总体准确性,通过接收者工作特征图(真阳性率与假阳性率)的曲线下面积(AUC)来估计(2 天、7 天和 90 天内卒中的 ABCD(2)评分的预设截断值的准确性),以及敏感性、特异性、预测值和似然比。
24 例患者因症状持续超过 24 小时而被排除在外。所有纳入的患者均由卒中医生进行了评估;301/488(61.7%)例患者确诊为 TIA。大多数(289/301;96.0%)患者完成了随访。4/292 例患者(1.37%;95%可信区间,0.37%-3.47%)在 2 天内发生卒中,7/289 例(2.42%;95%可信区间,0.98%-4.93%)在 90 天内发生卒中;2 天至 7 天内无患者发生卒中。确诊 TIA 患者的卒中 AUC 分别为 0.80(95%可信区间,0.68-0.91)和 0.62(95%可信区间,0.40-0.83),分别用于 2 天内和 90 天内的卒中。在截断值≥5 时,ABCD(2)评分对 2 天内的卒中具有中等特异性(0.58)和 90 天内的卒中(0.58),但阳性预测值(2 天,0.03;90 天,0.04)和阳性似然比(2 天,2.40;90 天,1.71)均较差。在其他预定截断值下,评分表现同样不佳。
鉴于其预测价值较差,单独使用 ABCD(2)评分可能不足以指导澳大利亚三级医院的临床治疗决策或服务组织。建议在其他澳大利亚环境中进行验证,然后再自信地应用。