Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2011 Feb 7;194(3):139-41. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04197.x.
The issue of whether medical practitioners should perform "ritual nicks" as a method of meeting demand for female genital mutilation (FGM) has recently been debated in the United States and Australia. Due to increasing numbers of people arriving and settling in Australia from African nations in which FGM is customary, demand for FGM in Australia is present and may be increasing. Australian law clearly prohibits performance of any type of FGM. FGM is also prohibited by the most recent policy of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). For legal, medical and social reasons, the RANZCOG policy is sound, and medical practitioners should not administer FGM in any form. Development of an evidence base regarding incidence of and attitudes towards FGM, and the need for post-FGM treatment, would help inform sound policy and practical responses. Strategies adopted in African nations to abolish FGM may assist in refining educational and supportive efforts.
最近,美国和澳大利亚就医疗从业者是否应该进行“割礼仪式”以满足女性割礼 (FGM) 的需求这一问题展开了辩论。由于越来越多的人从非洲国家抵达澳大利亚并定居,这些国家普遍存在割礼习俗,因此澳大利亚对割礼的需求确实存在且可能还在增加。澳大利亚法律明确禁止任何形式的 FGM。皇家澳大利亚和新西兰妇产科医师学院 (RANZCOG) 的最新政策也禁止进行 FGM。出于法律、医疗和社会原因,RANZCOG 的政策是合理的,医疗从业者不应该以任何形式实施 FGM。制定有关 FGM 的发生率和态度以及 FGM 后治疗需求的证据基础,将有助于制定合理的政策和采取切实的应对措施。在非洲国家采取的废除割礼习俗的策略可能有助于完善教育和支持工作。