Department of Primary Care and Community Care, Centre for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Med Educ. 2011 Mar;45(3):239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03876.x.
Gender is increasingly regarded as an important factor in doctor-patient communication education. This review aims to assess if and how gender is addressed by current assessment instruments for communication skills in medical education.
In 2009 at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, an online search was conducted in the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsycINFO and ERIC for references about communication skills assessment instruments designed to be completed by trained faculty staff and used in medical education. The search strategy used the following search terms: 'consultation skills'; 'doctor-patient communication'; 'physician-patient relations'; 'medical education'; 'instruments'; 'measurement', and 'assessment'. Papers published between January 1999 and June 2009 were included. The assessment instruments identified were analysed for gender-specific content.
The search yielded 21 communication skills assessment instruments. Only two of the 17 checklists obtained explicitly considered gender as a communication-related issue. Only six of 21 manuals considered gender in any way and none gave specific details to explain which aspects of communication behaviour should be assessed with regard to gender.
Very few communication assessment instruments in medical education focus on gender. Nevertheless, interest exists in using gender in communication skills assessment. The criteria for and purpose of assessing gender in communication skills in medical education are yet to be clarified.
性别越来越被视为医患沟通教育中的一个重要因素。本综述旨在评估当前医学教育中沟通技巧评估工具是否以及如何涉及性别问题。
2009 年,在奈梅亨拉德堡大学医学中心,在 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 ERIC 这三个文献数据库中进行了在线搜索,以获取有关旨在由经过培训的教师完成并用于医学教育的沟通技巧评估工具的参考文献。搜索策略使用了以下搜索词:“咨询技巧”;“医患沟通”;“医患关系”;“医学教育”;“仪器”;“测量”和“评估”。纳入的文献发表时间为 1999 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月。分析确定的评估工具是否存在性别特异性内容。
搜索结果共得到 21 种沟通技巧评估工具。在获得的 17 份清单中,只有两份明确将性别视为与沟通相关的问题。在 21 份手册中,只有 6 份以某种方式考虑了性别问题,没有一份手册给出了具体的细节来解释应该根据性别评估哪些沟通行为方面。
在医学教育中,很少有沟通评估工具关注性别问题。尽管如此,人们对在沟通技巧评估中使用性别还是很感兴趣的。在医学教育中,评估沟通技能方面的性别标准和目的仍有待澄清。