• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Who listens to our advice? A secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial testing an intervention designed to decrease delay in seeking treatment for acute coronary syndrome.谁会听从我们的建议?一项旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征患者治疗延误的干预措施临床试验数据的二次分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
2
A randomized clinical trial to reduce patient prehospital delay to treatment in acute coronary syndrome.一项旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征患者院前治疗延迟的随机临床试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):524-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.852608. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
3
A randomized controlled trial to reduce prehospital delay time in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).一项旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者院前延误时间的随机对照试验。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):495-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.114. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
The effect of a short one-on-one nursing intervention on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs related to response to acute coronary syndrome in people with coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial.一项针对冠心病患者对急性冠状动脉综合征反应的知识、态度和信念的短期一对一护理干预效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Aug;46(8):1037-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
A review of interventions aimed at reducing pre-hospital delay time in acute coronary syndrome: what has worked and why?急性冠状动脉综合征院前延误时间干预措施的回顾:哪些方法有效,原因是什么?
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Dec;11(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
6
Patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in New Zealand in 2007: results of a second comprehensive nationwide audit and a comparison with the first audit from 2002.2007年新西兰急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)住院患者:第二次全国性综合审计结果及与2002年首次审计的比较
N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):25-43.
7
Pre-hospital delay in acute coronary syndromes: PREDICT CVD-18.急性冠状动脉综合征的院前延误:PREDICT CVD - 18。
N Z Med J. 2012 Jan 20;125(1348):12-22.
8
Mass Media Campaigns' Influence on Prehospital Behavior for Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Evaluation of the Australian Heart Foundation's Warning Signs Campaign.大众媒体宣传活动对急性冠状动脉综合征院前行为的影响:对澳大利亚心脏基金会警示标志宣传活动的评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 6;4(7):e001927. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001927.
9
Effect of gender on evidence-based practice for Australian patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective multi-site study.
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2017 May;20(2):63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about acute coronary syndrome among patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴,诊断出患有急性冠状动脉综合征的患者对急性冠状动脉综合征的认识、态度和信念。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02893-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.
2
Barriers to timely treatment-seeking in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Malaysia: a qualitative study.马来西亚急性心肌梗死患者及时寻求治疗的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2016 May 28;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0155-5. eCollection 2016.
3
Stroke warning campaigns: delivering better patient outcomes? A systematic review.中风预警宣传活动:能带来更好的患者预后吗?一项系统综述。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Feb 25;6:61-73. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S54087. eCollection 2015.
4
Reducing the time-lag between onset of chest pain and seeking professional medical help: a theory-based review.减少胸痛发作与寻求专业医疗帮助之间的时间延迟:基于理论的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 6;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-15.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized clinical trial to reduce patient prehospital delay to treatment in acute coronary syndrome.一项旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征患者院前治疗延迟的随机临床试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):524-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.852608. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
2
The Control Attitudes Scale-Revised: psychometric evaluation in three groups of patients with cardiac illness.修订后的控制态度量表:三组心脏病患者的心理测量学评估
Nurs Res. 2009 Jan-Feb;58(1):42-51. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181900ca0.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index.急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)反应指数的心理测量评估。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Dec;30(6):584-94. doi: 10.1002/nur.20213.
4
New strategies in the assessment of psychological factors affecting medical conditions.评估影响医疗状况的心理因素的新策略。
J Pers Assess. 2007 Dec;89(3):216-28. doi: 10.1080/00223890701629649.
5
"The rust of life": impact of anxiety on cardiac patients.“生活的锈蚀”:焦虑对心脏病患者的影响
Am J Crit Care. 2007 Jul;16(4):361-9.
6
Anxiety worsens prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease.焦虑会使冠状动脉疾病患者的预后恶化。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 22;49(20):2021-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 4.
7
Factors influencing delay in seeking treatment for acute ischemic symptoms among lower income, urban women.影响低收入城市女性急性缺血症状就医延迟的因素。
Heart Lung. 2007 Mar-Apr;36(2):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.002.
8
Impact of anxiety and perceived control on in-hospital complications after acute myocardial infarction.焦虑和感知控制对急性心肌梗死后院内并发症的影响。
Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):10-6. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000245868.43447.d8.
9
Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council.减少急性冠状动脉综合征和中风患者寻求治疗的延迟:美国心脏协会心血管护理委员会和中风委员会的科学声明
Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):168-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176040. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
10
A nursing intervention to reduce prehospital delay in acute coronary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.一项减少急性冠状动脉综合征院前延误的护理干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):186-93. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200605000-00006.

谁会听从我们的建议?一项旨在减少急性冠状动脉综合征患者治疗延误的干预措施临床试验数据的二次分析。

Who listens to our advice? A secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial testing an intervention designed to decrease delay in seeking treatment for acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4217, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.016
PMID:21300515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3097294/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prolonged prehospital delay in persons experiencing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a problem. Understanding which patients respond best to particular interventions designed to decrease delay time would provide mechanistic insights into the process by which interventions work.

METHODS

In the PROMOTION trial, 3522 at-risk patients were enrolled from 5 sites in the United States (56.4%), Australia and New Zealand; 490 (N=272 intervention, N=218 control) had an acute event within 2 years. Focusing on these 490, we (1) identified predictors of a rapid response to symptoms, (2) identified intervention group subjects with a change in these predictors over 3 months of follow-up, and (3) compared intervention group participants with and without the favorable response pattern. Hypothesized predictors of rapid response were increased perceived control and decreased anxiety. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs were hypothesized to differ between responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Contrary to hypothesis, responders had low anxiety and low perceived control. Only 73 (26.8%) subjects showed this pattern 3 months following the intervention. No differences in ACS knowledge, attitudes, or beliefs were found.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study challenge existing beliefs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

New intervention approaches that focus on a realistic decrease in anxiety and perceived control are needed.

摘要

目的

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的院前延迟时间延长仍然是一个问题。了解哪些患者对旨在减少延迟时间的特定干预措施反应最好,可以深入了解干预措施发挥作用的机制。

方法

在 PROMOTION 试验中,从美国(56.4%)、澳大利亚和新西兰的 5 个地点招募了 3522 名高危患者;其中 490 名(N=272 例干预组,N=218 例对照组)在 2 年内发生急性事件。针对这 490 名患者,我们(1)确定了对症状快速反应的预测因素,(2)确定了干预组中这些预测因素在 3 个月随访期间发生变化的患者,(3)比较了干预组中具有和不具有有利反应模式的患者。快速反应的假设预测因素是增加的感知控制和减少的焦虑。假设知识、态度和信念在反应者和非反应者之间存在差异。

结果

与假设相反,反应者的焦虑和感知控制水平较低。仅 73 名(26.8%)患者在干预后 3 个月出现这种模式。在 ACS 知识、态度或信念方面没有发现差异。

结论

这项研究的结果挑战了现有的观念。

实践意义

需要新的干预方法,重点是降低焦虑和感知控制的现实程度。