School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Dec;11(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
Delay in seeking treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms is a well recognised problem. While the factors that influence pre-hospital delay have been well researched, to date this information alone has been insufficient in altering delay behaviour.
This paper reports the results of a critical appraisal of previously tested interventions designed to reduce pre-hospital delay in seeking treatment for ACS symptoms.
The search was confined to interventions published between 1986 and the present that were written in English and aimed at reducing pre-hospital delay time. The following databases were searched using keywords: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Pubmed, Academic Search Premier, Ovid, Cochrane, British Nursing Index, and Google Scholar. A total of eight intervention studies were identified as relevant. This review was developed following a systematic comparative analysis of those eight studies.
Seven of the eight interventions were based on mass media campaigns. One campaign was targeted at individuals. All were aimed at raising ACS symptom awareness and/or increasing prompt action in the presence of symptoms. Only two studies reported a statistically significant reduction in pre-hospital delay time.
In response to concerns about prolonged pre-hospital delay time in ACS, interventions targeting the problem have been developed. The literature indicates that responses to symptoms depend on a variety of factors. In light of this, interventions should include the scope of factors that can potentially influence pre-hospital delay time and ideally target those who are at greatest risk of an ACS event.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)症状的治疗延迟是一个众所周知的问题。虽然影响院前延迟的因素已经得到了充分的研究,但迄今为止,仅凭这些信息还不足以改变延迟行为。
本文报告了对以前测试的旨在减少 ACS 症状治疗前院外延迟的干预措施进行批判性评估的结果。
该搜索仅限于 1986 年至目前发表的、用英文撰写并旨在减少院前延迟时间的干预措施。使用关键词搜索了以下数据库:护理与联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、PubMed、学术搜索高级版、Ovid、Cochrane、英国护理索引和 Google Scholar。共确定了 8 项相关的干预研究。该综述是在对这 8 项研究进行系统比较分析的基础上制定的。
八项干预措施中有七项基于大众媒体宣传。一项宣传活动针对个人。所有这些活动都旨在提高 ACS 症状意识和/或在出现症状时立即采取行动。只有两项研究报告了院前延迟时间的统计学显著减少。
针对 ACS 治疗前院外延迟时间过长的问题,已经开发出了针对该问题的干预措施。文献表明,对症状的反应取决于多种因素。因此,干预措施应包括可能影响院前延迟时间的因素范围,并理想情况下针对那些 ACS 事件风险最高的人群。