School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Jul;22(4):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
The transition of drug policy from prohibition to harm reduction has never been easy. The deeply entrenched belief in prohibition shared by policy makers and religious leaders provided little room for alternatives, and change came only slowly. The non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in Malaysia played a pivotal role in effecting such a change. Understanding how they did so may be instructive for other similarly placed countries.
Data collected via reviews of published secondary sources, media reports and in-depth interviews with pioneers of harm reduction drawn from NGOs, medical practitioners and the police were analysed to construct the paper.
The policy change was the outcome of competition between three groups in the drug policy subsystem--the state, the Muslim religious lobby and the NGOs. Developments such as the poor outcomes from the prohibition programmes and the outbreak of HIV/AIDS did not change policy but did lead to a rethink of core beliefs in the state alliance and spawned a state-NGO partnership. The subsequent failure to meet the Millennium Development Goal with respect to HIV/AIDS in 2005 was seen as a failure of the Health Ministry which then led the final charge for a policy change arguing that a health crisis was imminent. The NGOs played a pivotal role in this process by educating their partners in the state coalition, by drawing academics and medical practitioners into advocacy and by engaging the religious lobby (albeit with varying success). They were also frontline players in implementing harm reduction programmes and successfully deflected criticisms from unconvinced Islamic groups away from the state.
Given their central role in the needle-syringe exchange programme, the NGOs are well positioned to convince injecting drug users to opt for voluntary medical treatment. This can potentially reduce both the harm from drug use and the prevalence of it.
从禁毒到减少伤害的药物政策转变从未容易过。政策制定者和宗教领袖根深蒂固的禁毒观念几乎没有留下任何替代方案的余地,变革进展缓慢。马来西亚的非政府组织(NGO)在实现这一转变方面发挥了关键作用。了解他们是如何做到的,可能对其他处于类似地位的国家具有启示意义。
通过对已发表的二手资料、媒体报道以及对来自 NGO、医疗从业者和警察的减少伤害先驱者的深入访谈进行回顾收集的数据进行分析,构建了本文。
政策的变化是药物政策子系统中的三个群体——国家、穆斯林宗教游说团体和 NGO——之间竞争的结果。禁毒计划的不良结果和艾滋病的爆发并没有改变政策,但确实导致了国家联盟核心信念的重新思考,并催生了国家-NGO 伙伴关系。随后,2005 年未能实现千年发展目标中有关艾滋病的目标被视为卫生部的失败,这促使卫生部最终主张进行政策变革,称卫生危机迫在眉睫。非政府组织在这一过程中发挥了关键作用,它们教育国家联盟中的合作伙伴,吸引学者和医疗从业者参与宣传,并与宗教游说团体接触(尽管取得的成功各不相同)。它们还是实施减少伤害方案的一线参与者,并成功地将来自持怀疑态度的伊斯兰团体的批评从国家身上转移开来。
鉴于非政府组织在针具交换计划中的核心作用,它们完全有能力说服注射毒品使用者选择自愿接受医疗治疗。这有可能减少毒品使用带来的危害并降低其流行率。