• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同行评审——一项普通医疗实践中的安全与质量改进举措。

Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice.

作者信息

Rutherford Angela

出版信息

Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1-2):30-2.

PMID:21301690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A general practice in inner city Melbourne (Victoria), committed to ensuring quality standards of clinical care, developed a process for peer review of their doctors' performance. The aim was to ensure that there was a robust and fair process for evaluation of doctor performance from both a safety point of view, and from the perspective of contribution to team based practice.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the process and outcomes of this appraisal process.

DISCUSSION

From the springboard of weekly clinical meetings which address critical incidents and near misses, the practice doctors developed an annual process of formal performance review incorporating hard and soft indicators of clinical performance and compliance with professional and practice standards. This type of activity falls within the scope of quality improvement in general practice.

摘要

背景

墨尔本(维多利亚州)市中心的一家全科诊所致力于确保临床护理的质量标准,为此制定了一个对医生表现进行同行评审的流程。目的是确保从安全角度以及对团队协作实践的贡献角度出发,有一个健全且公平的医生表现评估流程。

目的

本文描述了该评估流程的过程和结果。

讨论

以每周处理重大事件和未遂事故的临床会议为出发点,该诊所的医生制定了一个年度正式绩效评估流程,纳入了临床绩效的硬指标和软指标以及对专业和诊所标准的遵守情况。这类活动属于全科医疗质量改进的范畴。

相似文献

1
Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice.同行评审——一项普通医疗实践中的安全与质量改进举措。
Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1-2):30-2.
2
Voluntary review of quality of care peer review for patient safety.为患者安全进行的医疗质量同行评议自愿审查。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;21(4):557-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
Communities of practice - quality improvement or research in general practice.实践社区——全科医疗中的质量改进或研究。
Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1-2):72-5.
4
Participants' evaluation of a group-based organisational assessment tool in Danish general practice: the Maturity Matrix.参与者对丹麦全科医疗中一种基于群体的组织评估工具——成熟度矩阵的评价。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(5):311-22.
5
Peer review in clinical radiology practice.临床放射学实践中的同行评审。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Aug;199(2):W158-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8143.
6
The objective impact of clinical peer review on hospital quality and safety.临床同行评审对医院质量与安全的客观影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):110-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860610380732. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
7
Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.农村放射肿瘤学实践质量与大城市的一样好吗?澳大利亚放射治疗单机单元试验的结果。
Australas Radiol. 2007 Aug;51(4):381-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01754.x.
8
Achieving organisational competence for clinical leadership: the role of high performance work systems.实现临床领导力的组织能力:高绩效工作系统的作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(3):312-29. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-Jul-2012-0132.
9
The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.英国医学总会的绩效程序:工作场所绩效的同行评审
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35 Suppl 1:9-19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.0350s1009.x.
10
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.普通全科医生应用两种临床审计方法能力的差异:一项为期五年的同行评审评估研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):622-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00630.x.