Rigla Mercedes
Endocrinology Department, Hospital de Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):63-7. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500109.
Although current systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are the result of progressive technological improvement, and although a beneficial effect on glucose control has been demonstrated, few patients are using them. Something similar has happened to telemedicine (TM); in spite of the long-term experience, which began in the early 1980s, no TM system has been widely adopted, and presential visits are still almost the only way diabetologists and patients communicate. The hypothesis developed in this article is that neither CGM nor TM will ever be routinely implemented separately, and their consideration as essential elements for standard diabetes care will one day come from their integration as parts of a telemedical monitoring platform. This platform, which should include artificial intelligence for giving decision support to patients and physicians, will represent the core of a more complex global agent for diabetes care, which will provide control algorithms and risk analysis among other essential functions.
尽管当前的连续血糖监测(CGM)系统是技术不断进步的成果,并且尽管已证明其对血糖控制有有益效果,但使用它们的患者却很少。远程医疗(TM)也出现了类似情况;尽管自20世纪80年代初就开始有长期经验,但没有一个TM系统得到广泛采用,面对面就诊仍然几乎是糖尿病专家与患者沟通的唯一方式。本文提出的假设是,CGM和TM都不会单独常规实施,而将它们视为标准糖尿病护理的基本要素这一观念,有朝一日将源于它们作为远程医疗监测平台一部分的整合。这个平台应包括人工智能,为患者和医生提供决策支持,它将成为一个更复杂的糖尿病护理全球代理的核心,该代理将提供控制算法和风险分析等其他基本功能。