Givaudan UK Ltd, Ashford, Kent, UK.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 May;30(5):1096-108. doi: 10.1002/etc.492. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
Sesquiterpenes are ubiquitous in essential oils but an assessment of their environmental behavior is still required for their use as components of natural fragrance ingredients and oral care flavors. Persistency plays a key role in hazard and risk assessment, but the current knowledge on the biodegradation of sesquiterpenes in the aquatic environment is limited. This could have important consequences for the persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) assessment of essential oils because most of the sesquiterpene components have a log K(OW) of >4.5 and are identified as potentially bioaccumulating according to REACH screening criteria. In the present study, a persistency screening assessment was conducted on 11 cyclic sesquiterpenes selected from 10 different families of sesquiterpenes characterized by their carbon skeleton. Current biodegradation prediction models (BioWin™, BioHCwin, and Catalogic) were found to be of limited use because most of the sesquiterpenes studied were outside the structural domain of the models. Aerobic biodegradation was measured in a standard or prolonged Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 301F Manometric Respirometry test for ready biodegradability. α-Bisabolol, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, α-cedrene, cedrol, longifolene, and δ-cadinene exceeded the pass level of 60% degradation and can be regarded as not persistent. Alpha-gurjunene, himachalenes (α, β, γ), and (-)-thujopsene almost achieved the pass level reaching between 51% and 56% ultimate biodegradation. Although germacrene D only achieved 24% ultimate biodegradation, specific analysis at the end of the test did indicate complete primary degradation. Given that the shape of the biodegradation curves indicates poor bioavailability and ready biodegradability tests are very stringent, it is expected that all the sesquiterpenes tested in the present study would be degraded under environmental conditions.
倍半萜在香精油中普遍存在,但在将其用作天然香料成分和口腔护理香精的组成部分之前,仍需要对其环境行为进行评估。持久性在危害和风险评估中起着关键作用,但目前对水生环境中倍半萜生物降解的了解有限。这可能对精油的持久性、生物累积性和毒性(PBT)评估产生重要影响,因为大多数倍半萜成分的 log K(OW)大于 4.5,并且根据 REACH 筛选标准被确定为具有潜在生物累积性。在本研究中,对从具有其碳骨架特征的 10 种不同倍半萜族中选择的 11 种环状倍半萜进行了持久性筛选评估。当前的生物降解预测模型(BioWin™、BioHCwin 和 Catalogic)被发现用途有限,因为大多数研究的倍半萜都超出了模型的结构范围。好氧生物降解在标准或延长的经济合作与发展组织(OECD)301F 压力呼吸计可生物降解性测试中进行测量。α- 毕澄茄醇、α- 葎草烯、β- 石竹烯、α- 雪松烯、雪松醇、长叶烯和 δ- 杜松烯超过了 60%降解的通过水平,可被视为非持久性。α- 古巴烯、葎草烯(α、β、γ)和(-)- 雪松烯几乎达到了通过水平,达到了 51%至 56%的最终生物降解。尽管大根香叶烯 D 仅达到 24%的最终生物降解,但在测试结束时的特定分析确实表明完全进行了初级降解。由于生物降解曲线的形状表明生物利用度差,并且可生物降解性测试非常严格,预计本研究中测试的所有倍半萜都将在环境条件下降解。