Suppr超能文献

铒钇铝石榴石激光和空气喷砂对树脂基窝沟封闭剂材料微渗漏的影响。

Effects of Er:YAG laser and air abrasion on the microleakage of a resin-based fissure sealant material.

作者信息

Sancakli Hande Sar, Erdemir Ugur, Yildiz Esra

机构信息

Istanbul University, Department of Operative Dentistry, Capa, Turkey.

出版信息

Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Jul;29(7):485-92. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2889. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different surface pre-treatment techniques on the microleakage of a resin-based fissure sealant material.

METHODS

Thirty-five molars were divided into the following seven groups based on the surface pre-treatment technique used: (a) Erbium: Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) laser (7 W); (b) Er:YAG laser (7 W)+acid etching (with 37% phosphoric acid); (c) Er:YAG laser (5.5 W); (d) Er:YAG laser (5.5 W)+acid etching; (e) air abrasion+acid etching; (f) air abrasion; and (g) conventional acid etching. The sealant was placed according to the manufacturers' instructions and light-cured for 20 sec. The sealed teeth were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles (5°-55°C), then immersed in 5% methylene blue for 24 h and sectioned mesiodistally. Each section was analyzed and photographed using a light microscope. Microleakage was assessed quantitatively by the degree of dye penetration and also qualitatively, scored on a three-point rating scale. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Regardless of the fissure morphology and penetration depth, enamel surfaces conditioned with Er:YAG laser irradiation exhibited significantly higher microleakage than those conditioned with air abrasion followed by acid etching, and those conditioned with conventional acid etching (p < 0.05). Air abrasion followed by acid etching, as well as conventional acid etching, provided a sufficient seal, whereas laser irradiation alone or in combination with acid etching exhibited higher microleakage than did the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional acid etching remains the most effective and the simplest technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同表面预处理技术对树脂基窝沟封闭剂材料微渗漏的影响。

方法

根据所采用的表面预处理技术,将35颗磨牙分为以下七组:(a)铒:钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光(7瓦);(b)Er:YAG激光(7瓦)+酸蚀(用37%磷酸);(c)Er:YAG激光(5.5瓦);(d)Er:YAG激光(5.5瓦)+酸蚀;(e)气磨+酸蚀;(f)气磨;(g)传统酸蚀。按照制造商的说明放置封闭剂并光固化20秒。对封闭的牙齿进行10000次循环(5°-55°C)的热循环,然后浸入5%亚甲蓝中24小时,并沿近远中方向切片。使用光学显微镜对每个切片进行分析和拍照。通过染料渗透程度对微渗漏进行定量评估,并采用三点评分量表进行定性评分。数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。

结果

无论窝沟形态和渗透深度如何,经Er:YAG激光照射处理的釉质表面微渗漏显著高于经气磨后酸蚀处理的表面以及经传统酸蚀处理的表面(p < 0.05)。气磨后酸蚀以及传统酸蚀提供了足够的封闭效果,而单独激光照射或激光照射与酸蚀联合处理的微渗漏高于其他组。

结论

传统酸蚀仍然是最有效且最简单的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验