• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测再次剖宫产时腹腔内粘连的可靠方法:瘢痕特征。

A reliable way to predict intraabdominal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery: scar characteristics.

机构信息

Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):531-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01080.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01080.x
PMID:21306338
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate association between scar characteristics and intraabdominal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.

DESIGN

A prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary Government Maternity Training Hospital in Ankara, Turkey.

POPULATION

295 pregnant women with at least one prior cesarean delivery.

METHODS

All women were at least 36 weeks pregnant. Appearance of previous cesarean delivery scars was categorized into three groups - flat, depressed and elevated. Pigmentation status was also noted (non-pigmented or pigmented).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperatively detected adhesions, evaluated and classified into three groups (no adhesion, filmy adhesion and dense adhesion groups) by a modified Nair's classification.

RESULTS

Elevated scars had significantly more dense adhesion formation than depressed ones (31.4 vs. 12.7%, p=0.02). No difference was found for dense adhesions when depressed and flat scars were compared (12.7 vs. 6.8%, p=0.124). Of flat scars, 93.2% were free of dense adhesions. Pigmented scars had more dense adhesions than non-pigmented (26.6 vs. 9.3%, p<0.01). Using logistic regression analysis scar length, scar width and appearance of scar (flat or non-flat) were directly related to adhesion formation.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between scar type and adhesions, particularly for hypertrophic scars and dense adhesions.

摘要

目的

评估剖宫产术后再次粘连与瘢痕特征的相关性。

设计

前瞻性、横断面研究。

地点

土耳其安卡拉的三级政府妇产医院。

人群

295 名至少有一次剖宫产史的孕妇。

方法

所有孕妇均妊娠至少 36 周。将先前剖宫产瘢痕的外观分为三组:平坦、凹陷和隆起。还记录了色素沉着状态(非色素沉着或色素沉着)。

主要观察指标

术中发现的粘连,并通过改良的 Nair 分类法评估和分为三组(无粘连、薄膜状粘连和致密粘连组)。

结果

隆起的瘢痕形成致密粘连的比例明显高于凹陷的瘢痕(31.4%比 12.7%,p=0.02)。与凹陷的瘢痕相比,平坦的瘢痕形成致密粘连的比例无差异(12.7%比 6.8%,p=0.124)。93.2%的平坦瘢痕无致密粘连。色素沉着的瘢痕形成致密粘连的比例高于非色素沉着的瘢痕(26.6%比 9.3%,p<0.01)。使用逻辑回归分析,瘢痕长度、宽度和外观(平坦或不平坦)与粘连形成直接相关。

结论

瘢痕类型与粘连之间存在相关性,尤其是对于增生性瘢痕和致密粘连。

相似文献

1
A reliable way to predict intraabdominal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery: scar characteristics.预测再次剖宫产时腹腔内粘连的可靠方法:瘢痕特征。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):531-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01080.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
2
Abdominal scar characteristics as a predictor of intra-abdominal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.腹部瘢痕特征作为再次剖宫产时腹腔粘连预测指标的研究
Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.037. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
3
[Post-cesarean parietal scar characteristics are predictive of pelvic adhesions. A prospective cohort study].[剖宫产术后顶叶瘢痕特征可预测盆腔粘连。一项前瞻性队列研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Sep;44(7):621-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
Abdominal scar characteristics: do they predict intra-abdominal adhesions with repeat cesarean deliveries?腹部瘢痕特征:它们能否预测再次剖宫产时的腹腔粘连?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1643-8. doi: 10.1111/jog.12429.
5
Skin markers and the prediction of intraabdominal adhesion during second Cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中皮肤标记与腹腔内粘连的预测
Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(6):325-330. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0059.
6
Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions.剖宫产术中腹直肌和内脏腹膜的关闭与腹腔粘连。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;206(6):515.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Are the cesarean section skin scar characteristics associated with intraabdominal adhesions located at surgical and non-surgical sites.剖宫产皮肤瘢痕特征与手术及非手术部位的腹腔粘连有关吗?
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):839-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery.再次剖宫产术后粘连的形成及发病率
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):56.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.039.
9
Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions using striae gravidarum and scar characteristics in women undergoing repeated cesarean sections.利用妊娠纹和瘢痕特征预测多次剖宫产妇女的腹腔内粘连。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03763-z.
10
Do adhesions at repeat cesarean delay delivery of the newborn?再次剖宫产时的粘连是否会延迟新生儿娩出?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):380.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.088. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Intraperitoneal Adhesions in Repeated Cesarean Section Using Sliding Sign, Striae Gravidarum, and Cesarean Scar.利用滑动征、妊娠纹和剖宫产瘢痕预测再次剖宫产术中的腹腔粘连
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 May 2;36:44. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.44. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions using striae gravidarum and scar characteristics in women undergoing repeated cesarean sections.利用妊娠纹和瘢痕特征预测多次剖宫产妇女的腹腔内粘连。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03763-z.
3
Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
剖宫产术后皮肤切口瘢痕外观与子宫肌层残留厚度有关吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Is Striae Gravidarum related to Cesarean Scar and Peritoneal Adhesions?妊娠纹与剖宫产瘢痕及腹膜粘连有关吗?
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):568-573. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14288.