• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后皮肤切口瘢痕外观与子宫肌层残留厚度有关吗?

Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Senckenberg Foundation, Buergerhospital, Nibelungenallee 37-41, 60318, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Hessen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2
PMID:33415438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7960579/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to utilize the Manchester scar scale (MSS) and ultrasound in investigating the association between uterine wall defects and cutaneous scar characteristics after cesarean section (CS).

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. The degree of myometrial loss was quantified by calculating a residual myometrial thickness (RMT) ratio as a percentage of RMT to the pre-cesarean anterior uterine wall thickness. Cutaneous scar assessment was performed according to the MSS. Spearman's correlation and the Kruskal-Wallis test with a cut-off value of p < 0.05 were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty seven women, of which 2.4% had an Asian, 3.6% an Afro-American, 82% a Caucasian and 12% a Mediterranean background, were recruited. The RMT ratio ranged between 11.9 and 100% with a median of 55.8% and an average of 56%. MSS scores ranged from 4 to 13 with a median of 5 and an average of 6. Spearman's correlation between MSS and RMT ratio show a rho of - 0.01 with a p value of 0.8. The correlation between MSS and RMT ratio within the four ethnical groups showed a p value between 0.3 and 0.8 and a rho between 0.8 and - 0.8. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed an eta of 0.13 and a p value of 0.0002 for the effect of ethnicity on MSS and an eta of 0.009 and a p value of 0.68 for the effect of ethnicity on the RMT ratio.

CONCLUSION

CS laparotomy scars heal differently between ethnical groups, but generally with satisfying results. Ethnicity does not affect myometrial healing and scar appearance does not reflect myometrial healing after CS. Thus, separate uterine sonographic assessment is recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用曼彻斯特疤痕量表(MSS)和超声检查,探讨剖宫产(CS)后子宫壁缺陷与皮肤疤痕特征之间的关系。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。通过计算剩余子宫肌层厚度(RMT)与 CS 前子宫前壁厚度的比例,定量评估子宫肌层缺失程度。根据 MSS 评估皮肤疤痕。采用 Spearman 相关分析和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,p 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

共纳入 247 名女性,其中 2.4%为亚洲人,3.6%为非裔美国人,82%为白人,12%为地中海人。RMT 比值范围为 11.9%至 100%,中位数为 55.8%,平均为 56%。MSS 评分范围为 4 至 13,中位数为 5,平均为 6。MSS 与 RMT 比值之间的 Spearman 相关系数为-0.01,p 值为 0.8。四个种族组中 MSS 与 RMT 比值之间的相关性 p 值在 0.3 至 0.8 之间,rho 值在 0.8 至-0.8 之间。Kruskal-Wallis 检验显示,种族对 MSS 的影响 eta 值为 0.13,p 值为 0.0002,对 RMT 比值的影响 eta 值为 0.009,p 值为 0.68。

结论

CS 剖腹产后,不同种族间的手术疤痕愈合方式不同,但总体结果令人满意。种族并不影响子宫肌层的愈合,疤痕外观也不能反映 CS 后的子宫肌层愈合情况。因此,建议单独进行子宫超声评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/6e945d36951c/404_2020_5943_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/51fd5f1c1505/404_2020_5943_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/498af0f7443d/404_2020_5943_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/6e945d36951c/404_2020_5943_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/51fd5f1c1505/404_2020_5943_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/498af0f7443d/404_2020_5943_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e3d/7960579/6e945d36951c/404_2020_5943_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?剖宫产术后皮肤切口瘢痕外观与子宫肌层残留厚度有关吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05943-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.评估子宫剖宫产瘢痕愈合不全风险因素的标准化超声检查方法
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.一次择期剖宫产术后非妊娠子宫剖宫产瘢痕的形态学
Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(4):174-179. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0034.
4
Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.评估剖宫产术后子宫侧壁缺损及肌层残余厚度。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Mar;258:391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.033. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.既往剖宫产女性孕早期和孕晚期子宫瘢痕厚度:一项前瞻性对照研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jan;41(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.剖宫产术后女性妇科症状与子宫声像图特征的相关性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):485-491. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07526-x. Epub 2024 May 2.
7
Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.剖宫产术后子宫的超声解剖。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;304(6):1485-1491. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06074-y. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.二维和三维经阴道超声评估选定产科危险因素对剖宫产切口憩室形成的影响:病例对照研究。
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(5):378-382. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0024. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.利用非妊娠子宫剖宫产瘢痕的超声参数预测子宫破裂:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 29;14:365. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3.
10
Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术后子宫关闭对子宫肌层残余厚度的影响:一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Intra-abdominal Adhesions and Uterine Scar Grade Based on Abdominal Scar Characteristics in Women With a Previous Cesarean Section: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.基于既往剖宫产史女性腹部瘢痕特征预测腹腔粘连及子宫瘢痕分级:一项诊断准确性研究。
Eplasty. 2025 Jan 29;25:e5. eCollection 2025.
2
Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.比较不同超声检测方法准确评估剖宫产术后伤口愈合和瘢痕形成的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14837. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14837.

本文引用的文献

1
The B-mode sonographic evaluation of the post-caesarean uterine wall and its methodology: A study protocol.剖宫产术后子宫壁的B超评估及其方法:一项研究方案。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Dec;46(12):2547-2551. doi: 10.1111/jog.14492. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical wound complications in the cesarean section at-risk population: a parallel group randomised multicentre trial-the CYGNUS protocol.负压伤口疗法在高危剖宫产术预防手术切口并发症中的有效性:一项平行组随机多中心试验——CYGNUS 方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e035727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035727.
3
Are the cesarean section skin scar characteristics associated with intraabdominal adhesions located at surgical and non-surgical sites.
剖宫产皮肤瘢痕特征与手术及非手术部位的腹腔粘连有关吗?
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):839-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Effectiveness of Topical Onion Extract Gel in the Cosmetic Appearance of Blepharoplasty Scar.局部洋葱提取物凝胶对眼睑整形术后瘢痕外观的效果
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;11(10):31-35. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.剖宫产皮肤缝合随机研究中的患者满意度与美容效果
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(22):3830-3835. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1474870. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Does ultrasound-guided intervention during repeat cesarean sections improve uterine scar architecture and reduce the number of scars? A prospective controlled clinical intervention trial.再次剖宫产术中超声引导干预是否能改善子宫瘢痕结构并减少瘢痕数量?一项前瞻性对照临床干预试验。
J Perinat Med. 2018 Oct 25;46(8):857-866. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0394.
7
Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure.对非妊娠妇女子宫窝的超声检查:改良 Delphi 法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049.
8
Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.妊娠前及妊娠11 - 14周时剖宫产子宫切口瘢痕的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):105-109. doi: 10.1002/uog.16220.
9
Effect of caesarean section on maternal and foetal outcomes in acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术对妊娠急性脂肪肝母婴结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 8;6:28826. doi: 10.1038/srep28826.
10
Uterine Wound Healing: A Complex Process Mediated by Proteins and Peptides.子宫伤口愈合:一个由蛋白质和肽介导的复杂过程。
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2017;18(2):125-128. doi: 10.2174/1389203717666160322145939.