Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Centre for General Practice, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Feb 9;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-4.
During an influenza epidemic prompt diagnosis of influenza is important. This diagnosis however is still essentially based on the interpretation of symptoms and signs by general practitioners. No single symptom is specific enough to be useful in differentiating influenza from other respiratory infections. Our objective is to formulate prediction rules for the diagnosis of influenza with the best diagnostic performance, combining symptoms, signs and context among patients with influenza-like illness.
During five consecutive winter periods (2002-2007) 138 sentinel general practitioners sampled (naso- and oropharyngeal swabs) 4597 patients with an influenza-like illness (ILI) and registered their symptoms and signs, general characteristics and contextual information. The samples were analysed by a DirectigenFlu-A&B and RT-PCR tests. 4584 records were useful for further analysis.Starting from the most relevant variables in a Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model, we calculated the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC AUC), sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for positive (LR+) and negative test results (LR-) of single and combined signs, symptoms and context taking into account pre-test and post-test odds.
In total 52.6% (2409/4584) of the samples were positive for influenza virus: 64% (2066/3212) during and 25% (343/1372) pre/post an influenza epidemic. During and pre/post an influenza epidemic the LR+ of 'previous flu-like contacts', 'coughing', 'expectoration on the first day of illness' and 'body temperature above 37.8°C' is 3.35 (95%CI 2.67-4.03) and 1.34 (95%CI 0.97-1.72), respectively. During and pre/post an influenza epidemic the LR- of 'coughing' and 'a body temperature above 37.8°C' is 0.34 (95%CI 0.27-0.41) and 0.07 (95%CI 0.05-0.08), respectively.
Ruling out influenza using clinical and contextual information is easier than ruling it in. Outside an influenza epidemic the absence of cough and fever (> 37,8°C) makes influenza 14 times less likely in ILI patients. During an epidemic the presence of 'previous flu-like contacts', cough, 'expectoration on the first day of illness' and fever (>37,8°C) increases the likelihood for influenza threefold. The additional diagnostic value of rapid point of care tests especially for confirming influenza still has to be established.
在流感流行期间,及时诊断流感非常重要。然而,目前的诊断仍然主要依赖于全科医生对症状和体征的解读。没有任何单一的症状能够足以用于区分流感和其他呼吸道感染。我们的目标是制定出具有最佳诊断性能的预测规则,以综合流感样疾病患者的症状、体征和背景来诊断流感。
在连续五个冬季(2002-2007 年)期间,138 名哨点全科医生采集了 4597 例流感样疾病(ILI)患者的鼻和/或咽拭子样本,并记录了他们的症状和体征、一般特征以及背景信息。采集的样本通过 DirectigenFlu-A&B 和 RT-PCR 检测进行分析。4584 份记录可用于进一步分析。从广义估计方程(GEE)模型中的最相关变量开始,我们计算了考虑到预测试和后测试几率的单个和组合体征、症状和背景的接受者操作特征曲线(ROC AUC)下的面积、灵敏度、特异性和阳性测试结果(LR+)和阴性测试结果(LR-)的似然比。
共有 52.6%(2409/4584)的样本检测到流感病毒阳性:64%(2066/3212)在流感流行期间,25%(343/1372)在流感流行前/后。在流感流行期间和流行前/后,“有流感样接触史”、“咳嗽”、“患病第一天咳痰”和“体温高于 37.8°C”的 LR+分别为 3.35(95%CI 2.67-4.03)和 1.34(95%CI 0.97-1.72)。在流感流行期间和流行前/后,“咳嗽”和“体温高于 37.8°C”的 LR-分别为 0.34(95%CI 0.27-0.41)和 0.07(95%CI 0.05-0.08)。
使用临床和背景信息排除流感比确诊流感要容易。在流感流行之外,如果 ILI 患者没有咳嗽和发热(>37.8°C),那么流感的可能性降低 14 倍。在流感流行期间,如果存在“有流感样接触史”、咳嗽、“患病第一天咳痰”和发热(>37.8°C),则流感的可能性增加三倍。快速即时检测在诊断中的额外价值,特别是用于确认流感,仍有待确定。