Ball Chad G, Wyrzykowski Amy D, Nicholas Jeffrey M, Rozycki Grace S, Feliciano David V
Department of Surgery, Emory University, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):330-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318203285c.
Balloon catheter tamponade is a valuable technique for arresting exsanguinating hemorrhage. Indications include (1) inaccessible major vascular injuries, (2) large cardiac injuries, and (3) deep solid organ parenchymal bleeding. Published literature is limited to small case series. The primary goal was to review a recent experience with balloon catheter use for emergency tamponade in a civilian trauma population.
All patients requiring emergency use of a balloon catheter to tamponade exsanguinating hemorrhage (1998-2009) were included. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, technique, and outcomes were analyzed.
Of the 44 severely injured patients (82% presented with hemodynamic instability; mean base deficit=-20.4) who required balloon catheter tamponade, 23 of the balloons (52%) remained indwelling for more than 6 hours. Overall mortality depended on the site of injury/catheter placement and indwelling time (81% if <6 hours; 52% if ≥6 hours; p<0.05). Physiologic exhaustion was responsible for 76% of deaths in patients with short-term balloons. Mortality among patients with prolonged balloon catheter placement was 11%, 50%, and 88% for liver, abdominal vascular, and facial/pharyngeal injuries, respectively. Mean indwelling times for iliac, liver, and carotid injuries were 31 hours, 53 hours, and 78 hours, respectively. Overall survival rates were 67% (liver), 67% (extremity vascular), 50% (abdominal vascular), 38% (cardiac), and 8% (face). Techniques included Foley, Fogarty, Blakemore, and/or Penrose drains with concurrent red rubber Robinson catheters. Initial tamponade of bleeding structures was successful in 93% of patients.
Balloon catheter tamponade can be used in multiple anatomic regions and for variable patterns of injury to arrest ongoing hemorrhage. Placement for central hepatic gunshot wounds is particularly useful. This technique remains a valuable tool in a surgeon's armamentarium.
球囊导管填塞术是一种控制大出血的重要技术。其适应证包括:(1)难以接近的主要血管损伤;(2)严重心脏损伤;(3)深部实性器官实质出血。已发表的文献仅限于小病例系列。主要目的是回顾近期在 civilian 创伤人群中使用球囊导管进行紧急填塞的经验。
纳入所有在1998年至2009年间需要紧急使用球囊导管填塞大出血的患者。分析患者的人口统计学资料、损伤特征、技术及结果。
44例需要球囊导管填塞的重伤患者(82%出现血流动力学不稳定;平均碱缺失=-20.4)中,23个球囊(52%)留置超过6小时。总体死亡率取决于损伤部位/导管放置位置及留置时间(留置时间<6小时者死亡率为81%;≥6小时者为52%;p<0.05)。短期球囊留置患者中76%的死亡原因是生理耗竭。球囊导管长期留置患者中,肝损伤、腹部血管损伤及面部/咽部损伤患者的死亡率分别为11%、50%和88%。髂动脉、肝脏及颈动脉损伤的平均留置时间分别为31小时、53小时和78小时。总体生存率分别为67%(肝脏)、67%(肢体血管)、50%(腹部血管)、38%(心脏)和8%(面部)。技术包括使用 Foley 导管、Fogarty 导管、Blakemore 导管和/或 Penrose 引流管并同时使用红色橡胶 Robinson 导管。93%的患者出血结构的初始填塞成功。
球囊导管填塞术可用于多个解剖区域及不同损伤类型以控制持续出血。用于中央肝枪伤的放置尤其有用。该技术仍是外科医生武器库中的一项重要工具。