MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Feb 11;60(5):133-7.
CDC recommends syphilis serologic screening with a nontreponemal test, such as the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, to identify persons with possible untreated infection; this screening is followed by confirmation using one of several treponemal tests. Recently, the availability of automatable treponemal enzyme and chemiluminescence immunoassays (EIA/CIA) has led some laboratories to adopt a reverse sequence of screening in which a treponemal EIA/CIA is performed first, followed by testing of reactive sera with a nontreponemal test. To better understand the performance of reverse sequence screening for syphilis, CDC analyzed data from five laboratories that used reverse sequence screening during 2006-2010. This report describes the results of that analysis, which indicated that among sera reactive on initial screening with a treponemal EIA/CIA, 56.7% had a nonreactive RPR test. Among these discordant sera, 31.6% also were nonreactive by treponemal testing using Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) or fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests. Among discordant sera, the rate of nonreactive confirmatory treponemal tests was 2.9 times higher in a population with low prevalence of syphilis, suggesting that the low-prevalence population had a higher percentage of false-positive test results. Although CDC continues to recommend the traditional algorithm with reactive nontreponemal tests confirmed by treponemal testing, in this report CDC offers additional recommendations if reverse sequence syphilis screening is used.
美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)建议使用非梅毒螺旋体抗原血清学试验(如快速血浆反应素试验[RPR]或性病研究实验室试验[VDRL])筛查梅毒,以发现可能未经治疗的感染者;随后用几种梅毒螺旋体试验之一进行确认。最近,可自动化的梅毒螺旋体酶免疫分析(EIA/CIA)的出现,使一些实验室采用了反向序列筛查方法,即首先进行梅毒螺旋体 EIA/CIA 筛查,然后用非梅毒螺旋体试验检测阳性血清。为了更好地了解梅毒反向序列筛查的性能,CDC 分析了五个在 2006-2010 年期间采用反向序列筛查的实验室的数据。本报告介绍了该分析的结果,结果表明,在初始使用梅毒螺旋体 EIA/CIA 进行筛查的阳性血清中,56.7%的 RPR 试验结果为阴性。在这些不一致的血清中,31.6%的梅毒螺旋体试验结果也为阴性,包括用梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TP-PA)或荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA-ABS)进行的试验。在不一致的血清中,在梅毒发病率较低的人群中,非反应性确认性梅毒螺旋体试验的发生率高 2.9 倍,表明低发病率人群中假阳性试验结果的比例更高。尽管 CDC 继续推荐采用有反应性的非梅毒螺旋体试验,然后用梅毒螺旋体试验确认的传统算法,但在本报告中,如果使用反向序列梅毒筛查,CDC 还提供了其他建议。