Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01165-17. Print 2018 Jan.
Automated treponemal immunoassays are used for syphilis screening with the reverse-sequence algorithm; discordant results (e.g., enzyme immunoassay [EIA] reactive and reactive plasma reagin [RPR] nonreactive) are resolved with a second treponemal test. We conducted a study to determine automated immunoassay signal strength values consistently correlating with reactive confirmatory treponemal testing. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of four automated immunoassays (BioPlex 2200 microbead immunoassay [MBIA], Liaison chemiluminescence immunoassay [CIA], Advia-Centaur CIA, and Trep-Sure EIA) and three manual assays ( particle agglutination [TP-PA], fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption [FTA-ABS] test, and Inno-LIA line immunoassay). We compared signal strength values of automated immunoassays and positive and negative agreement. Among 1,995 specimens, 908 (45.5%) were true positives (≥4/7 tests reactive) and 1,087 (54.5%) were true negatives (≥4/7 tests nonreactive). Positive agreement ranged from 86.1% (83.7 to 88.2%) for FTA-ABS to 99.7% (99.0 to 99.9%) for Advia-Centaur CIA; negative agreement ranged from 86.3% (84.1 to 88.2%) for Trep-Sure EIA to 100% for TP-PA (99.6 to 100%). Increasing signal strength values correlated with increasing reactivity of confirmatory testing ( < 0.0001 for all automated immunoassays by Cochran-Armitage test for trend). All automated immunoassays had signal strength cutoffs corresponding to ≥4/7 reactive treponemal tests. BioPlex MBIA and Liaison CIA had signal strength cutoffs correlating with ≥99% and 100% TP-PA reactivity, respectively. The Advia-Centaur CIA and Trep-Sure EIA had signal strength cutoffs correlating with at least 95% TP-PA reactivity. All automated immunoassays had signal strength cutoffs correlating with at least 95% FTA-ABS reactivity. Assuming that a 95% level of confirmation is adequate, these signal strength values can be used in lieu of confirmatory testing with TP-PA and FTA-ABS.
梅毒筛查时采用反向序列算法的自动梅毒螺旋体免疫分析;对于(例如,酶免疫分析[EIA]阳性而快速血浆反应素[RPR]阴性)不一致的结果,采用第二种梅毒螺旋体检测方法来解决。我们进行了一项研究,以确定与反应性确认性梅毒检测一致的自动免疫分析信号强度值。我们对四种自动免疫分析(BioPlex 2200 微球免疫分析[MBIA]、Liaison 化学发光免疫分析[CIA]、Advia-Centaur CIA 和 Trep-Sure EIA)和三种手动分析(颗粒凝集[TP-PA]、荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收[FTA-ABS]试验和 Inno-LIA 线免疫分析)进行了横断面分析。我们比较了自动免疫分析的信号强度值以及阳性和阴性一致性。在 1995 个标本中,908 个(45.5%)为真阳性(≥4/7 个检测反应),1087 个(54.5%)为真阴性(≥4/7 个检测非反应)。阳性一致性范围从 FTA-ABS 的 86.1%(83.7 至 88.2%)到 Advia-Centaur CIA 的 99.7%(99.0 至 99.9%);阴性一致性范围从 Trep-Sure EIA 的 86.3%(84.1 至 88.2%)到 100%的 TP-PA(99.6 至 100%)。随着确认性检测反应性的增加,信号强度值也随之增加(所有自动免疫分析的 Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验均<0.0001)。所有自动免疫分析均具有与≥4/7 个反应性梅毒检测相对应的信号强度临界值。BioPlex MBIA 和 Liaison CIA 的信号强度临界值分别与≥99%和 100%的 TP-PA 反应性相关。Advia-Centaur CIA 和 Trep-Sure EIA 的信号强度临界值与至少 95%的 TP-PA 反应性相关。所有自动免疫分析的信号强度临界值均与至少 95%的 FTA-ABS 反应性相关。假设 95%的确认水平是足够的,这些信号强度值可用于替代与 TP-PA 和 FTA-ABS 的确认性检测。