Crustal Fluid Research Group, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan.
Ground Water. 2011 Nov-Dec;49(6):891-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00795.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
We propose a methodology for estimating the residence time of groundwater based on bomb-produced (36)Cl. Water samples were collected from 28 springs and 2 flowing wells located around Mt. Fuji, Central Japan. (36)Cl/Cl ratios in the water samples, determined by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), were between 43 × 10(-15) and 412 × 10(-15). A reference time series of the above-background (i.e., bomb-derived) (36)Cl concentration was constructed by linearly scaling the background-corrected Dye-3 data according to the estimated total bomb-produced (36)Cl fallout in the Mt. Fuji area. Assuming piston flow transport, estimates of residence time were obtained by comparing the measured bomb-derived (36)Cl concentrations in spring water with the reference curve. The distribution of (36)Cl-based residence times is basically consistent with that of tritium-based estimates calculated from data presented in previous studies, although the estimated residence times differ between the two tracers. This discrepancy may reflect chlorine recycling via vegetation or the relatively small change in fallout rate, approximately since 1975, which would give rise to large uncertainties in (36)Cl-based estimates of recharge for the period, approximately since 1975. Given the estimated ages for groundwater from flowing wells, dating based on a (36)Cl bomb pulse may be more reliable and sensitive for groundwater recharged before 1975, back as far as the mid-1950s.
我们提出了一种基于爆炸物产生的 (36)Cl 来估算地下水滞留时间的方法。从日本富士山周边的 28 个泉眼和 2 个自流井采集了水样。利用加速器质谱法(AMS)测定水样中的 (36)Cl/Cl 比值在 43×10(-15) 到 412×10(-15) 之间。根据富士山地区估算的总爆炸物产生的 (36)Cl 沉降量,通过线性比例修正 Dye-3 数据来构建背景以上(即爆炸物衍生)(36)Cl 浓度的参考时间序列。假设活塞流输送,通过将泉水实测的爆炸物衍生 (36)Cl 浓度与参考曲线进行比较,得出了滞留时间的估计值。基于 (36)Cl 的滞留时间分布与基于氚的估计值基本一致,尽管两种示踪剂的估计值不同。这种差异可能反映了氯通过植被的再循环,或者自 1975 年以来沉降率的相对较小变化,这会导致自 1975 年以来的补给期 (36)Cl 估算值存在较大不确定性。考虑到自流井地下水的估算年龄,基于 (36)Cl 爆炸脉冲的年代测定对于 1975 年以前补给的地下水可能更可靠和敏感,回溯到 20 世纪 50 年代中期。