Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Science. 2011 Feb 11;331(6018):721-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1201765.
The growth of electronic publication and informatics archives makes it possible to harvest vast quantities of knowledge about knowledge, or "metaknowledge." We review the expanding scope of metaknowledge research, which uncovers regularities in scientific claims and infers the beliefs, preferences, research tools, and strategies behind those regularities. Metaknowledge research also investigates the effect of knowledge context on content. Teams and collaboration networks, institutional prestige, and new technologies all shape the substance and direction of research. We argue that as metaknowledge grows in breadth and quality, it will enable researchers to reshape science-to identify areas in need of reexamination, reweight former certainties, and point out new paths that cut across revealed assumptions, heuristics, and disciplinary boundaries.
电子出版物和信息档案的发展使得人们有可能获取大量关于知识的知识,或者说“元知识”。我们回顾了元知识研究不断扩大的范围,该研究揭示了科学主张中的规律,并推断出这些规律背后的信念、偏好、研究工具和策略。元知识研究还调查了知识背景对内容的影响。团队和协作网络、机构声誉以及新技术都塑造了研究的实质和方向。我们认为,随着元知识在广度和质量上的增长,它将使研究人员能够重塑科学——确定需要重新审视的领域,重新权衡以前的确定性,并指出跨越已揭示的假设、启发式和学科边界的新路径。