• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学 X 射线:扫描和量化科学出版物的思想演变。

Scientific X-ray: Scanning and quantifying the idea evolution of scientific publications.

机构信息

Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275192. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275192
PMID:36170296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518912/
Abstract

The rapid development of modern science nowadays makes it rather challenging to pick out valuable ideas from massive scientific literature. Existing widely-adopted citation-based metrics are not adequate for measuring how well the idea presented by a single publication is developed and whether it is worth following. Here, inspired by traditional X-ray imaging, which returns internal structure imaging of real objects along with corresponding structure analysis, we propose Scientific X-ray, a framework that quantifies the development degree and development potential for any scientific idea through an assembly of 'X-ray' scanning, visualization and parsing operated on the citation network associated with a target publication. We pick all 71,431 scientific articles of citation counts over 1,000 as high-impact target publications among totally 204,664,199 publications that cover 16 disciplines spanning from 1800 to 2021. Our proposed Scientific X-ray reproduces how an idea evolves from the very original target publication all the way to the up to date status via an extracted 'idea tree' that attempts to preserve the most representative idea flow structure underneath each citation network. Interestingly, we observe that while the citation counts of publications may increase unlimitedly, the maximum valid idea inheritance of those target publications, i.e., the valid depth of the idea tree, cannot exceed a limit of six hops, and the idea evolution structure of any arbitrary publication unexceptionally falls into six fixed patterns. Combined with a development potential index that we further design based on the extracted idea tree, Scientific X-ray can vividly tell how further a given idea presented by a given publication can still go from any well-established starting point. Scientific X-ray successfully identifies 40 out of 49 topics of Nobel prize as high-potential topics by their prize-winning papers in an average of nine years before the prizes are released. Various trials on articles of diverse topics also confirm the power of Scientific X-ray in digging out influential/promising ideas. Scientific X-ray is user-friendly to researchers with any level of expertise, thus providing important basis for grasping research trends, helping scientific policy-making and even promoting social development.

摘要

现代科学的飞速发展使得从大量科学文献中筛选有价值的思想变得极具挑战性。现有的广泛采用的引文计量指标不足以衡量单一出版物所提出的思想的发展程度及其是否值得关注。在这里,受传统 X 射线成像的启发,它可以提供真实物体的内部结构成像以及相应的结构分析,我们提出了科学 X 射线,这是一种通过在与目标出版物相关的引文网络上进行“X 射线”扫描、可视化和解析的组合,来量化任何科学思想的发展程度和发展潜力的框架。我们从总共涵盖 1800 年至 2021 年 16 个学科的 204,664,199 篇出版物中,挑选了所有 71,431 篇引文计数超过 1,000 的高影响力目标出版物。我们提出的科学 X 射线通过提取“思想树”来重现一个思想如何从最初的目标出版物发展到最新状态,该“思想树”试图在每个引文网络下保留最具代表性的思想流结构。有趣的是,我们观察到,尽管出版物的引文数量可能会无限增加,但这些目标出版物的最大有效思想继承,即思想树的有效深度,不能超过六个跳跃的限制,并且任何任意出版物的思想演化结构都不可避免地落入六个固定模式。结合我们进一步基于提取的思想树设计的发展潜力指数,科学 X 射线可以生动地描述从给定出版物给定思想出发,它还能走多远。科学 X 射线成功地通过获奖论文识别出了 49 个诺贝尔奖主题中的 40 个作为高潜力主题,平均在奖项揭晓前九年。对各种主题的文章的各种试验也证实了科学 X 射线挖掘有影响力/有前途的思想的能力。科学 X 射线对任何专业水平的研究人员都很友好,因此为掌握研究趋势、帮助科学决策甚至促进社会发展提供了重要依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/f528897790e5/pone.0275192.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/2a6e8ac50cb3/pone.0275192.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/b50b8b50c9e4/pone.0275192.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/b7bd8f321548/pone.0275192.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/f528897790e5/pone.0275192.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/2a6e8ac50cb3/pone.0275192.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/b50b8b50c9e4/pone.0275192.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/b7bd8f321548/pone.0275192.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3137/9518912/f528897790e5/pone.0275192.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientific X-ray: Scanning and quantifying the idea evolution of scientific publications.科学 X 射线:扫描和量化科学出版物的思想演变。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275192. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The citation wake of publications detects nobel laureates' papers.出版物的引用轨迹能检测出诺贝尔奖得主的论文。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e113184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113184. eCollection 2014.
4
Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.科学论文的引文索引与评价
Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1213-9. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1213.
5
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
6
The publication impact of the first 100 THOR Network publications by bibliometric and social network analyses.通过文献计量学和社会网络分析,评估前 100 篇 THOR 网络出版物的发表影响力。
Transfusion. 2022 Aug;62 Suppl 1:S1-S11. doi: 10.1111/trf.16956. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
7
Abass Alavi: A giant in Nuclear Medicine turns 80 and is still going strong!阿巴斯·阿拉维:核医学领域的一位巨擘迎来80岁生日,依然精力充沛!
Hell J Nucl Med. 2018 Jan-Apr;21(1):85-87. doi: 10.1967/s002449910713. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
9
The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.哥伦比亚科学界精英——科学图谱绘制与使用综合引文指标与诺贝尔奖得主的比较
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269116. eCollection 2022.
10
How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes.引文助推如何促进科学范式转变和诺贝尔奖。
PLoS One. 2011 May 4;6(5):e18975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018975.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics.科学奖项与科学主题的非凡增长。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5619. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25712-2.
2
Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science.减缓了大型科学领域的规范进展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 12;118(41). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021636118.
3
Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research.从知识图谱动态中学习可对有影响力的研究提供预警。
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;39(10):1300-1307. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00907-6. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Technological opportunity discovery for technological convergence based on the prediction of technology knowledge flow in a citation network.基于引文网络中技术知识流动预测的技术融合技术机会发现
J Informetr. 2018 Nov;12(4):1199-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics.基于语义和神经网络的量子物理研究趋势预测及其应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 28;117(4):1910-1916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914370116. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Nature's reach: narrow work has broad impact.自然的影响:狭义的研究有着广泛的影响。
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):32-34. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03308-7.
7
Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal.重新思考影响因子:评判期刊的更好方法。
Nature. 2019 May;569(7758):621-623. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01643-3.
8
A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates.诺贝尔奖得主的出版物记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2019 Apr 18;6(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0033-6.
9
Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science.科学奖项网络预测谁能推动科学的边界。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 11;115(50):12608-12615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800485115.
10
Quantifying reputation and success in art.量化艺术中的声誉和成功。
Science. 2018 Nov 16;362(6416):825-829. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7224. Epub 2018 Nov 8.