• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主 everolimus 洗脱支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗长段下肢动脉病变致严重肢体缺血:单纯球囊血管成形术与补救性裸金属支架置入术的比较。

Primary everolimus-eluting stenting versus balloon angioplasty with bailout bare metal stenting of long infrapopliteal lesions for treatment of critical limb ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, School of Medicine, Rion, Greece.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Feb;18(1):1-12. doi: 10.1583/10-3242.1.

DOI:10.1583/10-3242.1
PMID:21314342
Abstract

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of a single-center prospective study investigating primary placement of everolimus-eluting metal stents for recanalization of long infrapopliteal lesions compared to a matched historical control group treated with plain balloon angioplasty and provisional placement of bare metal stents in a bailout manner.

METHODS

The study included 81 patients (63 men; mean age 71 years, range 45-85) suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI) and angiographically proven long-segment (at least 1 lesion >4.5 cm) de novo infrapopliteal artery disease who underwent below-the-knee revascularization with either primary placement of everolimus-eluting stents (n = 47, 51 limbs, 102 lesions) or angioplasty and bailout bare metal stenting (n = 34, 36 limbs, 72 lesions). Clinical and angiographic follow-up was collected at regular time intervals. Primary clinical and angiographic endpoints included patient survival, major amputation-free survival, angiographic primary patency, angiographic binary restenosis (>50%), and overall event-free survival. Results were stratified according to endovascular treatment received. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to adjust for confounding factors of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were well matched. No significant differences were identified between the 2 groups with regard to overall 3-year patient survival (82.2% versus 65.7%; p = 0.90) and amputation-free survival (77.1% versus 86.9%; p = 0.20). Up to 3 years, lesions fully covered with everolimus-eluting stents were associated with significantly higher primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) 7.98, 95% CI 3.69 to 17.25, p < 0.0001], reduced binary restenosis (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.74 to 4.99, p < 0.0001), and improved overall event-free survival (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.13, p = 0.015) versus the matched historical control group.

CONCLUSION

Primary infrapopliteal everolimus-eluting stenting for CLI treatment significantly inhibits restenosis and improves long-term angiographic patency and overall patient event-free survival compared to balloon angioplasty and bailout bare metal stenting.

摘要

目的

报告一项单中心前瞻性研究的长期结果,该研究调查了初次放置依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗长段(至少 1 个病变>4.5cm)下肢动脉再通与匹配的历史对照组中单纯球囊血管成形术和临时放置裸金属支架治疗的效果。

方法

该研究纳入了 81 名(63 名男性;平均年龄 71 岁,范围 45-85 岁)患有严重肢体缺血(CLI)和经血管造影证实的长段(至少 1 个病变>4.5cm)新发生的下肢动脉疾病的患者,他们接受了膝下血运重建,初次放置依维莫司洗脱支架(n=47,51 条肢体,102 个病变)或单纯球囊血管成形术和临时放置裸金属支架(n=34,36 条肢体,72 个病变)。以定期时间间隔收集临床和血管造影随访。主要临床和血管造影终点包括患者生存率、免于主要截肢的生存率、血管造影初始通畅率、血管造影二进制再狭窄(>50%)和总体无事件生存率。结果根据接受的血管内治疗进行分层。应用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析调整混杂因素的异质性。

结果

基线人口统计学特征匹配良好。2 组之间在 3 年总体患者生存率(82.2%与 65.7%;p=0.90)和免于截肢的生存率(77.1%与 86.9%;p=0.20)方面无显著差异。在 3 年期间,完全覆盖依维莫司洗脱支架的病变与显著更高的初始通畅率相关[风险比(HR)7.98,95%置信区间(CI)3.69 至 17.25,p<0.0001]、降低的二进制再狭窄(HR 2.94,95% CI 1.74 至 4.99,p<0.0001)和改善的总体无事件生存率(HR 2.19,95% CI 1.16 至 4.13,p=0.015)与匹配的历史对照组相比。

结论

与单纯球囊血管成形术和临时放置裸金属支架相比,初次下肢动脉依维莫司洗脱支架治疗严重肢体缺血可显著抑制再狭窄,并改善长期血管造影通畅率和总体患者无事件生存率。

相似文献

1
Primary everolimus-eluting stenting versus balloon angioplasty with bailout bare metal stenting of long infrapopliteal lesions for treatment of critical limb ischemia.主 everolimus 洗脱支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗长段下肢动脉病变致严重肢体缺血:单纯球囊血管成形术与补救性裸金属支架置入术的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Feb;18(1):1-12. doi: 10.1583/10-3242.1.
2
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架在伴有严重肢体缺血和腘动脉以下动脉闭塞性疾病患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
3
Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia and Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease.依维莫司洗脱支架用于治疗严重肢体缺血和腘下动脉闭塞性疾病患者。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Feb;51(2):60-66. doi: 10.1177/1538574416689429. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
4
Sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents after suboptimal infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: enduring 1-year angiographic and clinical benefit.对于严重肢体缺血患者,在腘下血管成形术效果欠佳后,西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸支架的比较:具有持续1年的血管造影和临床益处。
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Apr;14(2):241-50. doi: 10.1177/152660280701400217.
5
Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of infrapopliteal arteries in chronic limb ischemia: long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗慢性肢体缺血性胫腓动脉病变:长期临床及血管造影随访。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Feb;19(1):12-9. doi: 10.1583/11-3665.1.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of infrapopliteal drug-eluting stents.药物涂层支架在治疗主髂动脉病变中的成本效果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):90-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0370-8. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Long-term outcomes following primary drug-eluting stenting of infrapopliteal bifurcations.原发药物洗脱支架置入术治疗腘下分叉病变的长期结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Dec;19(6):788-96. doi: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3993R.1.
8
Primary use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the infrapopliteal arteries.西罗莫司洗脱支架在腘动脉中的主要用途。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Aug;17(4):480-7. doi: 10.1583/10-3073.1.
9
Infrapopliteal application of sirolimus-eluting versus bare metal stents for critical limb ischemia: analysis of long-term angiographic and clinical outcome.西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架在腘下动脉治疗严重肢体缺血中的应用:长期血管造影及临床结果分析
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.031. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
10
Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia.PADI试验的长期随访:经皮腔内血管成形术与药物洗脱支架治疗严重肢体缺血的腘下病变对比研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 14;6(4):e004877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004877.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Conventional Endovascular Therapies in Symptomatic Infrapopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架与传统血管内治疗方法治疗有症状的腘下外周动脉疾病的Meta分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100024. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100024. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in infrapopliteal arteries.腘下动脉药物洗脱支架植入术疗效的Meta分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Aug 6;11(22):5273-5287. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i22.5273.
3
Stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with below-the-knee disease: A propensity score-matched analysis.
支架置入术与单纯球囊血管成形术治疗膝下病变患者:倾向评分匹配分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0251755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251755. eCollection 2021.
4
Current evidence of drug-elution therapy for infrapopliteal arterial disease.腘下动脉疾病药物洗脱治疗的当前证据。
World J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 26;11(1):13-23. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i1.13.
5
Revisiting endovascular treatment in below-the-knee disease. Are drug-eluting stents the best option?重新审视膝下疾病的血管内治疗。药物洗脱支架是最佳选择吗?
World J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 26;10(11):196-200. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i11.196.
6
Endovascular treatment of infrapopliteal arteries: angioplasty vs stent in the drug-eluting era.药物洗脱时代的下肢动脉腔内治疗:血管成形术与支架治疗。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):793-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3094-0. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
7
Drug-coated balloons for coronary and peripheral interventional procedures.药物涂层球囊在冠状动脉和外周血管介入治疗中的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):635-41. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0290-x.