Siablis Dimitris, Karnabatidis Dimitris, Katsanos Konstantinos, Diamantopoulos Athanasios, Spiliopoulos Stavros, Kagadis George C, Tsolakis John
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Patras, GR 265 00, Rion, Greece.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.031. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
To present the 3-year angiographic and clinical results of a prospective registry investigating the performance of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) versus bare metal stents (BMSs) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) treatment.
A single-center double-arm prospective registry included patients with CLI who underwent infrapopliteal revascularization with angioplasty and "bailout" use of an SES or BMS. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was scheduled at regular time intervals. Primary clinical and angiographic endpoints included mortality, limb salvage, primary patency, binary angiographic restenosis (ie, >50%), and clinically driven repeat intervention-free survival. Results were stratified according to stent type, and cumulative proportion outcomes were determined by Kaplan-Meier plots. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was applied to adjust for confounding factors of heterogeneity.
In total, 103 patients were included in the analysis; 41 (75.6% with diabetes) were treated with a BMS (47 limbs; 77 lesions) and 62 (87.1% with diabetes) with an SES (75 limbs; 153 lesions). At 3 years, SES-treated lesions were associated with significantly better primary patency (hazard ratio [HR], 4.81; 95% CI, 2.91-7.94; P < .001), reduced binary restenosis (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58; P < .001), and better repeat intervention-free survival (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.30-5.00; P = .006) versus BMS-treated ones. No significant differences were identified between SESs and BMSs with regard to overall 3-year patient mortality (29.3% vs 32.0%; P = .205) and limb salvage (80.3% vs 82.0%; P = .507).
Infrapopliteal application of SESs for CLI significantly improves angiographic long-term patency and reduces infrapopliteal vascular restenosis versus BMSs, thereby lessening the rate of clinically driven repeat interventions.
展示一项前瞻性注册研究的3年血管造影和临床结果,该研究调查西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)与裸金属支架(BMS)在治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)方面的性能。
一项单中心双臂前瞻性注册研究纳入了接受腘动脉以下血管成形术和“补救性”使用SES或BMS进行血运重建的CLI患者。定期安排临床和血管造影随访。主要临床和血管造影终点包括死亡率、肢体挽救、原发性通畅率、二元血管造影再狭窄(即>50%)以及无临床驱动的重复干预生存率。结果根据支架类型进行分层,累积比例结果通过Kaplan-Meier图确定。应用多变量Cox比例风险回归分析来调整异质性的混杂因素。
总共103例患者纳入分析;41例(75.6%患有糖尿病)接受BMS治疗(47条肢体;77处病变),62例(87.1%患有糖尿病)接受SES治疗(75条肢体;153处病变)。3年时,与接受BMS治疗的病变相比,接受SES治疗的病变在原发性通畅率方面显著更好(风险比[HR],4.81;95%CI,2.91 - 7.94;P <.001),二元再狭窄减少(HR,0.38;95%CI,0.25 - 0.58;P <.001),且无重复干预生存率更高(HR,2.56;95%CI,1.30 - 5.00;P =.006)。在总体3年患者死亡率(29.3%对32.0%;P =.205)和肢体挽救率(80.3%对82.0%;P =.507)方面,SES和BMS之间未发现显著差异。
与BMS相比,在腘动脉以下应用SES治疗CLI可显著改善血管造影长期通畅率并减少腘动脉以下血管再狭窄,从而降低临床驱动的重复干预率。