Suppr超能文献

E-OA-07 治疗中重度骨关节炎症状的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照研究。

Efficacy and safety of E-OA-07 in moderate to severe symptoms of osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

ENovate Biolife, Division of Exotic Naturals, Redwood City, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):170-7. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318209df49.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a polyherbal preparation E-OA-07 was compared against placebo in patients with moderate to severe symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, in a double-blind, randomized, parallel groups study. Male or female subjects with American Rheumatism Association functional class II/III and Kellgren Lawrence grade 2 or 3 OA of the knee, who had moderate to severe OA symptoms as recorded by a score of at least 60 on the modified version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, and an overall pain score of at least 70 mm on a 100 mm Visual analogue (VAS) scale were studied. Subjects received 2 capsules of E-OA-07 or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks and paracetamol up to 2 gm per day as rescue medication. Efficacy outcome measures were WOMAC and VAS scores, functional tests for joint mobility and gait, consumption of rescue medication, investigator's global assessment and subjects' opinion. Safety was assessed through incidence of adverse events and subject's assessment of tolerability. After 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction of WOMAC scores in the E-OA-07 group as compared with placebo (P < 0.01). Mean (±SEM) reductions in WOMAC scores of pain, stiffness, and physical function for E-OA-07 versus placebo were 8.86 (1.77) versus 2.50 (0.76), 3.00 (0.65) versus 0.75 (0.45), and 30.00 (5.22) versus 10.87 (2.18). Significant between-group differences were also observed for VAS scores of pain and stiffness. The symptom alleviating effect of E-OA-07 persisted over a follow-up period of 4 and 6 weeks as VAS pain and stiffness scores continued to remain statistically lower (P < 0.01) in the E-OA-07 group than placebo. Subject's opinion was significantly greater in favor of E-OA-07 than placebo, whereas both groups received favorable responses from investigator. Consumption of rescue medication and tolerability ratings were similar between the 2 groups. One E-OA-07 subject was hospitalized due to accidental fall and withdrawn from the study. No other serious adverse event occurred. The effect of E-OA-07 in relieving moderate to severe symptoms of OA of the knee is well tolerated, superior, and more persistent than placebo.

摘要

一项针对膝关节中度至重度骨关节炎(OA)患者的双盲、随机、平行组研究比较了一种草药制剂 E-OA-07 与安慰剂的疗效和安全性。符合美国风湿病学会功能分类 II/III 级和 Kellgren Lawrence 分级 2 或 3 级膝关节 OA、改良版 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学(WOMAC)骨关节炎指数评分至少 60 分记录有中度至重度 OA 症状和整体疼痛评分至少 70mm 的男性或女性受试者 100mm 视觉模拟(VAS)量表被研究。受试者接受 2 粒 E-OA-07 或安慰剂,每日 2 次,持续 12 周,并可使用扑热息痛,每天最多 2 克作为解救药物。疗效评估指标包括 WOMAC 和 VAS 评分、关节活动度和步态的功能测试、解救药物的使用、研究者的总体评估和受试者的意见。安全性通过不良事件的发生率和受试者对耐受性的评估来评估。经过 12 周的治疗,E-OA-07 组的 WOMAC 评分与安慰剂相比有显著降低(P <0.01)。E-OA-07 组 WOMAC 评分中疼痛、僵硬和身体功能的平均(±SEM)降低分别为 8.86(1.77)与 2.50(0.76)、3.00(0.65)与 0.75(0.45)和 30.00(5.22)与 10.87(2.18)。VAS 疼痛和僵硬评分也观察到两组之间有显著差异。E-OA-07 的症状缓解作用在 4 周和 6 周的随访期间持续存在,VAS 疼痛和僵硬评分持续保持统计学意义(P <0.01)E-OA-07 组低于安慰剂组。受试者对 E-OA-07 的评价明显好于安慰剂,而两组均得到了研究者的积极反馈。两组解救药物的使用和耐受性评分相似。一名 E-OA-07 受试者因意外跌倒住院并退出研究。没有发生其他严重不良事件。E-OA-07 缓解膝关节中度至重度 OA 症状的效果良好,耐受性好,优于安慰剂,且更持久。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验