• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高结直肠癌筛查参与度的策略的定性评估。

A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake.

机构信息

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jan;57(1):e7-15.

PMID:21322288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024174/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To obtain data that could be used to optimize the content and design of the targeted, mailed invitations that Ontario's provincewide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program plans to use to increase screening uptake; to identify other strategies to increase CRC screening uptake; and to describe the effects of this qualitative work on a subsequent quantitative pilot study.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured focus groups.

SETTING

Four different Ontario communities.

PARTICIPANTS

Six focus groups comprising a total of 62 participants.

METHODS

Six focus groups were conducted in 4 different Ontario communities. For 3 of the communities, participants were recruited from the general population by a private marketing firm, using random-digit dialing, and received a small honorarium for participating. In Sault Ste Marie, participants were convenience samples recruited from a large primary care practice and were not offered compensation. Responses were elicited regarding various strategies for promoting CRC screening. Findings represent all responses observed as well as recommendations to program planners based on focus groups observations.

MAIN FINDINGS

Key themes identified included the importance of receiving a CRC screening invitation from one's family physician; a desire for personalized, brief communications; and a preference for succinct information in mailed materials. Strong support was indicated for direct mailing of the CRC screening kit (fecal occult blood test). Our findings substantially influenced the final design and content of the envelope and letter to be mailed in the subsequent quantitative pilot study.

CONCLUSION

We report strong support from our focus groups for a succinct, personalized invitation for CRC screening from one's own family physician. We have also shown that qualitative evaluation can be used to provide decision makers with pertinent and timely knowledge. Our study is highly relevant to other public health programs, particularly other Canadian jurisdictions planning organized CRC screening programs.

摘要

目的

获取数据,以便优化安大略省全省范围的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划用于提高筛查参与度的有针对性、邮寄邀请的内容和设计;确定其他提高 CRC 筛查参与度的策略;并描述这项定性工作对随后的定量试点研究的影响。

设计

使用半结构式焦点小组的定性研究。

地点

安大略省的四个不同社区。

参与者

62 名参与者,共分为 6 个焦点小组。

方法

在安大略省的四个不同社区进行了 6 个焦点小组。对于其中 3 个社区,参与者是由一家私人营销公司通过随机数字拨号从一般人群中招募的,并因参与而获得少量酬金。在苏圣玛丽,参与者是从一个大型基层医疗实践中招募的方便样本,没有获得补偿。调查了促进 CRC 筛查的各种策略。研究结果代表了从焦点小组观察中得出的所有观察结果,以及基于这些观察结果向计划制定者提出的建议。

主要发现

确定的关键主题包括从家庭医生那里收到 CRC 筛查邀请的重要性;个性化、简短交流的愿望;以及对邮寄材料中简洁信息的偏好。直接邮寄 CRC 筛查工具(粪便潜血试验)得到了强烈支持。我们的研究结果极大地影响了随后定量试点研究中要邮寄的信封和信件的最终设计和内容。

结论

我们的焦点小组报告强烈支持从自己的家庭医生那里收到简洁、个性化的 CRC 筛查邀请。我们还表明,定性评估可用于为决策者提供相关和及时的知识。我们的研究与其他公共卫生计划高度相关,特别是其他计划开展有组织 CRC 筛查计划的加拿大司法管辖区。

相似文献

1
A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake.提高结直肠癌筛查参与度的策略的定性评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jan;57(1):e7-15.
2
ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: family physician perceptions.结肠癌筛查初级保健邀请试点项目:家庭医生的看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Oct;58(10):e570-7.
3
ColonCancerCheck primary care invitation pilot project: patient perceptions.结肠癌筛查初级保健邀请试点项目:患者认知。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):e541-9.
4
Using physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response.在一项有组织的结直肠癌筛查项目中使用与医生相关的邮寄邀请函:有效性及与回应相关的因素
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 12;4(3):e004494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004494.
5
Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.邮寄邀请策略对提高男性粪便潜血试验参与率的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2013 Jul 31;14:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-239.
6
Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.增加结直肠癌筛查参与率:直接邮寄粪便潜血试验试剂盒给既往未应答者的一项群组随机试验结果。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;136(6):E697-703. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29191. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
7
Fecal occult blood test screening uptake among immigrants from Muslim majority countries: A retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.穆斯林国家移民的粪便潜血试验筛查参与情况:加拿大安大略省的一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2019 Nov;8(16):7108-7122. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2541. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Using population data to reduce disparities in colorectal cancer screening, Arkansas, 2006.利用人口数据减少阿肯色州结肠癌筛查中的差异,2006 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E138. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110256.
9
Two randomized controlled trials for colorectal cancer screening invitations developed using a behavioral science approach.两项基于行为科学方法制定的用于结直肠癌筛查邀请的随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106918. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106918. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10
Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.阻碍结直肠癌筛查的态度中的性别差异。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 24;13:500. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-500.

引用本文的文献

1
What Patients Want in a Smartphone App That Supports Colonoscopy Preparation: Qualitative Study to Inform a User-Centered Smartphone App.患者希望智能手机应用程序在结肠镜检查准备中提供什么:一项定性研究,为以用户为中心的智能手机应用程序提供信息。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 2;7(7):e12242. doi: 10.2196/12242.
2
Questionnaire Validation of Colorectal Cancer Literacy Scale among Thai People in Northeastern Thailand.泰国东北部人群结直肠癌知识量表的问卷效度验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):645-651. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.645.
3
A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK.英国结直肠癌发病率、筛查率、诊断途径、癌症分期和生存率的性别差异综述。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7.
4
Equity and practice issues in colorectal cancer screening: Mixed-methods study.结直肠癌筛查中的公平性与实践问题:混合方法研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Apr;62(4):e186-93.
5
ColonCancerCheck primary care invitation pilot project: patient perceptions.结肠癌筛查初级保健邀请试点项目:患者认知。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):e541-9.
6
ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: family physician perceptions.结肠癌筛查初级保健邀请试点项目:家庭医生的看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Oct;58(10):e570-7.
7
Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening.胶囊结肠镜检查可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 26;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-80.
8
Reactions to a targeted intervention to increase fecal occult blood testing among average-risk adults waiting for screening colonoscopy.针对提高等待结肠镜筛查的平均风险成年人粪便潜血检测率的靶向干预措施的反应。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;25(5):248-52. doi: 10.1155/2011/397302.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer testing in Canada--2008.2008年加拿大的结直肠癌检测
Health Rep. 2009 Sep;20(3):21-30.
2
Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.女性对乳腺钼靶筛查提醒信的看法:对来自23个家庭健康网络的女性进行的混合方法研究
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Jun;55(6):622-3.e1-4.
3
International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates.结直肠癌发病率的国际趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1688-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0090.
4
Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial.乙状结肠镜筛查后七年患结直肠癌的风险:随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 May 29;338:b1846. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1846.
5
Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental design.芬兰将结直肠癌筛查作为一项公共卫生政策的检测、阶段及项目敏感性:实验设计
BMJ. 2008 Nov 20;337:a2261. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2261.
6
Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施以提高社区对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的需求:一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S34-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.002.
7
Patient views on reminder letters for influenza vaccinations in an older primary care patient population: a mixed methods study.老年初级保健患者群体对流感疫苗接种提醒信的看法:一项混合方法研究
Can J Public Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;99(2):133-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405461.
8
Acceptability of reminder letters for Papanicolaou tests: a survey of women from 23 Family Health Networks in Ontario.巴氏涂片检查提醒信的可接受性:安大略省23个家庭健康网络中女性的调查
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Oct;29(10):829-34. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32640-8.
9
An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.提前通知信可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率。
J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):73-5. doi: 10.1258/096914107781261927.
10
Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.英国结直肠癌筛查示范试点第一轮的结果。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):133. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C. Epub 2004 Jul 5.