Suppr超能文献

创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?

Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Then Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Revised Trauma Score is used worldwide in the prehospital setting and provides a snapshot of patient's physiological state. Several studies have shown that the reliability of the RTS is high in trauma outcomes. In the Netherlands, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are mostly used for delivery of specialized trauma teams on-scene and occasionally for patient transportation. In our trauma system, the Emergency Medical Services crew performs triage after arrival on-scene and cancels the HEMS-dispatch if deemed unnecessary. In this study we assessed the ability of a maximum on-scene Revised Trauma Score (RTS=12) to be used as a triage tool for HEMS cancellation.

METHODS

All patients with a maximum on-scene RTS after blunt trauma (with or without receiving HEMS care) who were presented in the trauma resuscitation room of two Level-1 trauma centers during a period of 6 months, were included. Information concerning prehospital and in-hospital vital parameters, severity and localization of the injuries, and the in-hospital course were analyzed. Major trauma patients were classified using the following parameters: Injury Severity Score of at least 16, emergency intervention, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and forty blunt trauma patients having a maximum RTS were included between 1 July and 31 December 2006. Eighty patients received on-scene HEMS care. Almost 16% of the total population concerned major trauma patients, of which only 25 (36%) received HEMS care. In 17 patients (3.9%), the RTS deteriorated during transportation. Major trauma patients sustained more injuries to the chest, abdomen, and lower extremities.

CONCLUSION

The RTS alone is not a reliable triage tool for HEMS cancellations in our trauma system and will lead to a considerable rate of undertriage with one in every six cancellations being incorrect. Other criteria based on patient's vital signs, combined with anatomical and mechanism of injury parameters should be developed to safely minimize triage errors.

摘要

简介

修订后的创伤评分在全球范围内用于院前环境,并提供了患者生理状态的快照。多项研究表明,RTS 在创伤结果中的可靠性很高。在荷兰,直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)主要用于现场派遣专业创伤团队,偶尔也用于患者转运。在我们的创伤系统中,紧急医疗服务人员在现场到达后进行分类,并在认为不必要时取消 HEMS 派遣。在这项研究中,我们评估了最大现场修订创伤评分(RTS=12)作为 HEMS 取消分类工具的能力。

方法

所有钝器创伤后最大现场 RTS 的患者(无论是否接受 HEMS 护理),在 6 个月期间被纳入两个一级创伤中心的创伤复苏室。分析了院前和院内生命参数、损伤的严重程度和定位以及院内病程的信息。使用以下参数对严重创伤患者进行分类:损伤严重程度评分至少为 16、紧急干预、重症监护病房入院和院内死亡。

结果

2006 年 7 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,纳入了 440 名最大 RTS 的钝器创伤患者。80 名患者在现场接受了 HEMS 护理。几乎 16%的总人群是严重创伤患者,其中只有 25 名(36%)接受了 HEMS 护理。在 17 名患者(3.9%)中,RTS 在转运过程中恶化。严重创伤患者胸部、腹部和下肢受伤更多。

结论

在我们的创伤系统中,单独的 RTS 不是 HEMS 取消的可靠分类工具,这将导致相当大的分类不足率,每六次取消中有一次不正确。应根据患者生命体征、解剖和损伤机制参数制定其他标准,以安全地最大限度地减少分类错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验