• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场临床检查的额外数据显著但略微提高了直升机紧急医疗服务任务期间修订创伤评分对主要并发症的预测准确性。

Additional data from clinical examination on site significantly but marginally improve predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score for major complications during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service missions.

作者信息

Gałązkowski Robert, Farkowski Michał M, Rabczenko Daniel, Marciniak-Emmons Marta, Darocha Tomasz, Timler Dariusz, Sterliński Maciej

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medical Services, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Second Department of Coronary Artery Disease, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):865-870. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61884. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2016.61884
PMID:30002706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6040125/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) accurately identifies trauma patients at high risk of adverse events or death. Less is known about its usefulness in the general population and non-trauma recipients of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS). The RTS is a simple tool and omits a lot of other data obtained during clinical evaluation. The aim was to assess the role of the RTS to identify patients at risk of major complications (death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, intubation) in the general population of HEMS patients. Clinical factors beyond the RTS were analyzed to identify additional prognostic factors for predicting major complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records of adult patients routinely collected during HEMS missions in the years 2011-2014 was performed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 19 554 HEMS missions. Patients were 55 ±20 years old and 68% were male. The most common indication for HEMS was diseases of the circulatory system - 41%. Major complications occurred in 2072 (10.6%) cases. In the general population of HEMS patients, the RTS accurately identified individuals at risk of major complications at a cut-off value of 10.5 and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.5%. In multivariate analysis, additional clinical data derived from clinical examination (ECG; skin, pupil and breathing examination) significantly but marginally improved the accuracy of RTS assessment: AUC 95.6% ( < 0.001 for the difference).

CONCLUSIONS

The Revised Trauma Score accurately identifies individuals at risk of major complications during HEMS missions regardless of the indication. Additional clinical data significantly but marginally improved the accuracy of RTS in the general population of HEMS patients.

摘要

引言

修订创伤评分(RTS)能准确识别有不良事件或死亡高风险的创伤患者。对于其在直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的普通人群和非创伤患者中的效用,人们了解较少。RTS是一个简单工具,遗漏了临床评估期间获得的许多其他数据。目的是评估RTS在HEMS患者普通人群中识别有重大并发症(死亡、心肺复苏、除颤、插管)风险患者的作用。分析了RTS之外的临床因素,以确定预测重大并发症的其他预后因素。

材料与方法

对2011 - 2014年HEMS任务期间常规收集的成年患者病历进行回顾性分析。

结果

分析包括19554次HEMS任务。患者年龄为55±20岁,68%为男性。HEMS最常见的指征是循环系统疾病——41%。2072例(10.6%)发生了重大并发症。在HEMS患者普通人群中,RTS在临界值为10.5且曲线下面积(AUC)为93.5%时能准确识别有重大并发症风险的个体。在多变量分析中,临床检查(心电图;皮肤、瞳孔和呼吸检查)得出的额外临床数据显著但轻微提高了RTS评估的准确性:AUC为95.6%(差异<0.001)。

结论

修订创伤评分能准确识别HEMS任务期间有重大并发症风险的个体,无论指征如何。额外临床数据显著但轻微提高了RTS在HEMS患者普通人群中的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/6040125/12d928c44d22/AMS-14-28212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/6040125/182a661409c1/AMS-14-28212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/6040125/12d928c44d22/AMS-14-28212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/6040125/182a661409c1/AMS-14-28212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/661b/6040125/12d928c44d22/AMS-14-28212-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Additional data from clinical examination on site significantly but marginally improve predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score for major complications during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service missions.现场临床检查的额外数据显著但略微提高了直升机紧急医疗服务任务期间修订创伤评分对主要并发症的预测准确性。
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):865-870. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61884. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
2
Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.
3
Missions of the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service in rural and urban areas in Poland - A comparative retrospective analysis.波兰农村和城市地区直升机紧急医疗服务的任务——一项比较性回顾分析。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019 Jun 17;26(2):355-360. doi: 10.26444/aaem/106223. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
EMS and emergency department physician triage: injury severity in trauma patients transported by helicopter.紧急医疗服务(EMS)与急诊科医生的分诊:直升机转运创伤患者的损伤严重程度
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):198-202. doi: 10.1080/10903120590924681.
5
Does helicopter transport improve outcomes independently of emergency medical system time?直升机转运是否能独立于紧急医疗体系时间改善预后?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):149-54; discussion 154-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827890cc.
6
Characteristics of patients treated by the Danish Helicopter Emergency Medical Service from 2014-2018: a nationwide population-based study.2014-2018 年丹麦直升机紧急医疗服务救治患者的特征:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;27(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0672-9.
7
Characteristics of aeromedical transport, both interhospital and directly from the scene of the incident, in patients with acute myocardial infarction or acute trauma between 2011-2016 in Poland: A case-control study.2011-2016 年波兰急性心肌梗死或急性创伤患者的医联转运和现场直接转运的航空医疗转运特征:病例对照研究。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Nov;28(11):1495-1505. doi: 10.17219/acem/109456.
8
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) Response in Rural Areas in Poland: Retrospective Study.波兰农村地区的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)反应:回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):1532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091532.
9
Ten years of helicopter emergency medical services in Germany: do we still need the helicopter rescue in multiple traumatised patients?德国直升机紧急医疗服务十年:对于多处创伤患者,我们仍需要直升机救援吗?
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.018.
10
Helicopter emergency medical services missions to islands and the mainland during a 3-year period in Denmark: a population-based study on patient and sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and use of healthcare services.丹麦 3 年期间直升机紧急医疗服务往返于岛屿和大陆的任务:基于人群的患者和社会人口学特征、合并症以及医疗保健服务使用情况的研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 18;29(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00963-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of the Revised Trauma Score with Mortality and Prehospital LSI Among Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients.创伤与非创伤患者中修订创伤评分与死亡率及院前损伤严重度指数的关联
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024 Nov 15:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2425382.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective survey of critical care procedures performed by physicians in helicopter emergency medical service: is clinical exposure enough to stay proficient?对直升机紧急医疗服务中医师执行的重症监护程序的前瞻性调查:临床接触足以保持熟练程度吗?
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Jun 11;23:45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0128-9.
2
Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study.院前麻醉医师能否可靠地使用 NACA 严重程度评分预测死亡率?一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Nov;57(10):1253-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12208.
3
Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)对院外心搏骤停的反应。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Jan 7;21:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-1.
4
Does helicopter transport improve outcomes independently of emergency medical system time?直升机转运是否能独立于紧急医疗体系时间改善预后?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):149-54; discussion 154-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827890cc.
5
Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients.老年创伤患者中修订的创伤和损伤严重程度评分的评估。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Apr;5(2):131-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.96481.
6
Severity of cardiovascular disease patients transported by air ambulance.由空中救护车运送的心血管疾病患者的严重程度。
Air Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;30(6):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2011.05.004.
7
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.pROC:一个用于 R 和 S+的开源软件包,用于分析和比较 ROC 曲线。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77.
8
Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations?创伤修正评分最高值是否可作为直升机紧急医疗服务取消的安全分诊工具?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(4):197-201. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344912e.
9
Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence.是 HEMS 中的 H 还是 EMS 对创伤患者死亡率有影响?系统评价证据。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Sep;27(9):692-701. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.087486. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
10
A systematic review of the costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services.直升机紧急医疗服务的成本与效益的系统评价。
Injury. 2010 Jan;41(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.030.