• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下切除无蒂和扁平结肠腺瘤后息肉复发。

Polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat colonic adenomas.

机构信息

Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Queens Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2389-95. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1609-y. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-011-1609-y
PMID:21327705
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is used for treatment of sessile and flat colonic adenomas. There is limited data comparing polyp recurrence between piecemeal and en-bloc resections.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence density and predictive factors for polyp recurrence after piecemeal and en-bloc resections.

METHODS

Patients undergoing EMR of flat or sessile adenomas≥10 mm were included. Incidence density (ID) and incidence rate ratio (IRR) of polyp recurrence were calculated. Predictive factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariate analysis using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (males 54, mean age 68) with 121 polyps were included. Sixty-seven polyps (mean size±SD, 23.3±9.2 mm) were resected piecemeal and 54 polyps (mean size 14.7±5.1 mm) were resected en-bloc. There were 12 recurrences in the piecemeal group and two in the en-bloc group. The ID of polyp recurrence in the piecemeal group was 13.1 (95% CI 7.43-23.03) and in the en-bloc group was 2.7 (95% CI 0.67-10.78) per 100 person-years of follow-up. Piecemeal resections were 5.5 (95% CI 1.1-30.48, P=0.045) times and flat polyps were 6.6 (95% CI 1.22-35.53, P=0.028) times more likely to result in recurrence compared to en-bloc resections and sessile polyps, respectively. In the piecemeal group, additional use of argon plasma coagulation (APC) did not affect the recurrence (OR 0.46, P=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Piecemeal resections and flat polyps are associated with higher recurrence following EMR. Additional use of APC did not affect the recurrence rates after piecemeal resection.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)用于治疗息肉样和扁平结直肠腺瘤。关于分片切除与整块切除的息肉复发率比较,相关数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在评估分片切除与整块切除后息肉复发的发生率密度和预测因素。

方法

纳入行 EMR 治疗的直径≥10mm 的扁平或息肉样腺瘤患者。计算息肉复发的发生率密度(ID)和复发率比值(IRR)。采用多变量 logistic 回归分析评估复发的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 105 例(男 54 例,平均年龄 68 岁)患者的 121 个息肉。67 个息肉(平均大小±标准差,23.3±9.2mm)行分片切除,54 个息肉(平均大小 14.7±5.1mm)行整块切除。分片切除组有 12 个息肉复发,整块切除组有 2 个息肉复发。分片切除组的息肉复发 ID 为 13.1(95%CI7.43-23.03),整块切除组为 2.7(95%CI0.67-10.78)/100 人-年。与整块切除相比,分片切除的复发风险高 5.5 倍(95%CI1.1-30.48,P=0.045),扁平息肉的复发风险高 6.6 倍(95%CI1.22-35.53,P=0.028)。在分片切除组中,额外使用氩等离子凝固术(APC)不会影响复发(OR0.46,P=0.29)。

结论

分片切除和扁平息肉与 EMR 后较高的复发率相关。APC 的额外使用并不会影响分片切除后的复发率。

相似文献

1
Polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat colonic adenomas.内镜下切除无蒂和扁平结肠腺瘤后息肉复发。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2389-95. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1609-y. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
2
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗进展期结直肠黏膜肿瘤的疗效及预测黏膜下癌的价值。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1909-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
4
Endoscopic mucosal ablation: a new argon plasma coagulation/injection technique to assist complete resection of recurrent, fibrotic colon polyps (with video).内镜黏膜下消融术:一种新的氩等离子体凝固/注射技术,可辅助完整切除复发性纤维结肠息肉(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
5
Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy.大型无蒂结肠腺瘤:使用氩等离子体凝固器辅助分块圈套息肉切除术。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jun;49(6):731-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70291-9.
6
Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.内镜黏膜下切除术-预切开术与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗直径为 10-20mm 的无蒂结直肠息肉。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 7;28(45):6397-6409. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397.
7
An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.使用高倍放大染色结肠镜对结直肠内镜黏膜切除术的评估:1000例结肠镜检查的前瞻性研究。
Endoscopy. 2004 Jun;36(6):491-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814397.
8
Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and sessile colorectal adenomas: our experience with long-term follow-ups.扁平及广基结直肠腺瘤的内镜黏膜切除术:我们的长期随访经验
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014 Jan;71(1):33-8. doi: 10.2298/vsp120424040g.
9
En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection is equally effective for sessile serrated polyps and conventional adenomas.整块内镜黏膜切除术对无蒂锯齿状息肉和传统腺瘤同样有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1871-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5876-3. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型和巨大型无蒂和扁平结直肠息肉:一项长期随访的单中心经验。
Endoscopy. 2009 Oct;41(10):829-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215091. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of three electrosurgical modes for endoscopic mucosal resection of 10- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: Randomized controlled trial.三种电外科模式用于10至20毫米大肠息肉内镜黏膜切除术的比较:随机对照试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 28;13:a26636177. doi: 10.1055/a-2663-6177. eCollection 2025.
2
Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment.大肠广基息肉的内镜下切除:当前治疗标准
eGastroenterology. 2024 Apr 3;2(2):e100025. doi: 10.1136/egastro-2023-100025. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
The Relationship Between Serum Lipids and the Formation of Colorectal Polyps.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps.“注射-切割”内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型无蒂和扁平结直肠息肉的疗效、安全性和结局。
Digestion. 2010;82(4):213-20. doi: 10.1159/000284397. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
2
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.
3
Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up.
血清脂质与大肠息肉形成之间的关系
Cureus. 2024 Apr 3;16(4):e57511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57511. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Analysis of risk factors for postoperative bleeding and polyp recurrence in adolescents with gastric polyps treated with endoscopic mucosal resection: a retrospective cohort study.内镜黏膜切除术治疗青少年胃息肉术后出血及息肉复发的危险因素分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):375-386. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-43. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.内镜黏膜下切除术-预切开术与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗直径为 10-20mm 的无蒂结直肠息肉。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 7;28(45):6397-6409. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397.
6
Elevated serum triglyceride predicts recurrence of colorectal polyps in patients with advanced adenomas.血清甘油三酯升高可预测高级腺瘤患者结直肠息肉的复发。
Lipids Health Dis. 2020 Sep 23;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12944-020-01388-3.
7
Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).水下与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗小尺寸无蒂结直肠息肉:一项随机对照试验(小尺寸无蒂结直肠息肉的水下内镜黏膜切除术与传统内镜黏膜切除术对比)
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01457-y.
8
Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas in the elderly.老年人大的无蒂结直肠腺瘤内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)的安全性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1711-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2892-7. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Large Colorectal Lesions: Evaluation and Management.大肠大病变:评估与管理
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 23;23(4):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpge.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
10
Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas > 20 mm: Risk factors for recurrence.直径大于20毫米的大肠腺瘤的内镜黏膜切除术:复发的危险因素
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar 10;8(5):276-81. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i5.276.
内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型和巨大型无蒂和扁平结直肠息肉:一项长期随访的单中心经验。
Endoscopy. 2009 Oct;41(10):829-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215091. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
4
Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas.大型无蒂腺瘤内镜分片切除术后“晚期”复发的发生率及预测因素
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.037. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors.结直肠肿瘤内镜切除术后的局部复发
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Feb;24(2):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0596-8. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
6
Standard "inject and cut" endoscopic mucosal resection technique is practical and effective in the management of superficial colorectal neoplasms.标准的“注射并切除”内镜黏膜切除术技术在浅表性结直肠肿瘤的治疗中切实可行且有效。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9983-z. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
7
Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth?确定结直肠肿瘤性病变的治疗策略:内镜评估还是用于诊断浸润深度的非抬举征?
Endoscopy. 2007 Aug;39(8):701-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966587.
8
Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps.161例大肠广基或扁平息肉的内镜黏膜切除术
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;42(7):859-66. doi: 10.1080/00365520601137280.
9
Perforation: part and parcel of endoscopic resection?穿孔:内镜切除术的必然组成部分?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4):602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.034.
10
Endoscopic treatment of large sessile and flat colorectal lesions.大肠广基和扁平病变的内镜治疗
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;22(1):54-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mog.0000198075.59910.1f.