Cahill Kate, Stead Lindsay F, Lancaster Tim
Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub5.
Nicotine receptor partial agonists may help people to stop smoking by a combination of maintaining moderate levels of dopamine to counteract withdrawal symptoms (acting as an agonist) and reducing smoking satisfaction (acting as an antagonist). Varenicline was developed as a nicotine receptor partial agonist from cytisine, a drug widely used in central and eastern Europe for smoking cessation. The first trial reports of varenicline were released in 2006, and further trials have now been published or are currently underway.
The primary objective of this review is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine receptor partial agonists, including varenicline and cytisine, for smoking cessation.
We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's specialised register for trials, using the terms ('varenicline' or 'cytisine' or 'Tabex' or 'nicotine receptor partial agonist') and 'smoking' in the title or abstract, or as keywords. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL using MeSH terms and free text, and we contacted authors of trial reports for additional information where necessary. The latest search was in September 2010.
We included randomized controlled trials which compared the treatment drug with placebo. We also included comparisons with bupropion and nicotine patches where available. We excluded trials which did not report a minimum follow-up period of six months from start of treatment.
We extracted data on the type of participants, the dose and duration of treatment, the outcome measures, the randomization procedure, concealment of allocation, and completeness of follow up.The main outcome measured was abstinence from smoking after at least six months from the beginning of treatment. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence, and preferred biochemically validated rates where they were reported. Where appropriate we performed meta-analysis to produce a risk ratio, using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model.
We found 11 trials of varenicline compared with placebo for smoking cessation; three of these included a bupropion experimental arm. We also found one relapse prevention trial, comparing varenicline with placebo, and two open-label trials comparing varenicline with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). We also include one trial in which all the participants were given varenicline, but received behavioural support either online or by phone calls, or by both methods. This trial is not included in the analyses, but contributes to the data on safety and tolerability. The included studies covered >10,300 participants, 6892 of whom used varenicline. We identified one trial of cytisine (Tabex) for inclusion.The pooled risk ratio (RR) (10 trials, 4443 people, excluding one trial evaluating long term safety) for continuous abstinence at six months or longer for varenicline at standard dosage versus placebo was 2.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01 to 2.66). Varenicline at lower or variable doses was also shown to be effective, with an RR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.78; 4 trials, 1272 people). The pooled RR for varenicline versus bupropion at one year was 1.52 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.88; 3 trials, 1622 people). The RR for varenicline versus NRT for point prevalence abstinence at 24 weeks was 1.13 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.35; 2 trials, 778 people). The two trials which tested the use of varenicline beyond the 12-week standard regimen found the drug to be well-tolerated during long-term use. The main adverse effect of varenicline was nausea, which was mostly at mild to moderate levels and usually subsided over time. Post-marketing safety data raised questions about a possible association between varenicline and depressed mood, agitation, and suicidal behaviour or ideation. The labelling of varenicline was amended in 2008, and the manufacturers produced a Medication Guide. Thus far, surveillance reports and secondary analyses of trial data lend little support to a causal relationship.The one cytisine trial included in this review found that more participants taking cytisine stopped smoking compared with placebo at two-year follow up, with an RR of 1.61 (95% CI 1.24 to 2.08).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline at standard dose increased the chances of successful long-term smoking cessation between two- and threefold compared with pharmacologically unassisted quit attempts. Lower dose regimens also conferred benefits for cessation, while reducing the incidence of adverse events. More participants quit successfully with varenicline than with bupropion. Two open-label trials of varenicline versus NRT suggested a modest benefit of varenicline but confidence intervals did not rule out equivalence. Limited evidence suggests that varenicline may have a role to play in relapse prevention. The main adverse effect of varenicline is nausea, but mostly at mild to moderate levels and tending to subside over time. Possible links with serious adverse events, including depressed mood, agitation and suicidal thoughts, have been reported but are so far not substantiated.There is a need for further independent community-based trials of varenicline, to test its efficacy and safety in smokers with varying co-morbidities and risk patterns. There is a need for further trials of the efficacy of treatment extended beyond 12 weeks. Cytisine may also increase the chances of quitting, but the evidence at present is inconclusive.
尼古丁受体部分激动剂可通过维持适度多巴胺水平以抵消戒断症状(发挥激动剂作用)和降低吸烟满足感(发挥拮抗剂作用)的联合机制帮助人们戒烟。伐尼克兰是从金雀花碱开发而来的尼古丁受体部分激动剂,金雀花碱是一种在中东欧广泛用于戒烟的药物。伐尼克兰的首批试验报告于2006年发布,更多试验现已发表或正在进行中。
本综述的主要目的是评估尼古丁受体部分激动剂(包括伐尼克兰和金雀花碱)用于戒烟的疗效和耐受性。
我们在Cochrane烟草成瘾小组的专业试验注册库中进行检索,使用标题或摘要中出现的术语(“伐尼克兰”或“金雀花碱”或“Tabex”或“尼古丁受体部分激动剂”)以及“吸烟”作为关键词。我们还使用医学主题词和自由文本在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和CINAHL中进行检索,并在必要时联系试验报告的作者以获取更多信息。最新检索时间为2010年9月。
我们纳入了将治疗药物与安慰剂进行比较的随机对照试验。如有可用数据,我们还纳入了与安非他酮和尼古丁贴片的比较。我们排除了未报告从治疗开始起至少六个月随访期的试验。
我们提取了关于参与者类型、治疗剂量和持续时间、结局指标、随机化程序、分配隐藏以及随访完整性的数据。主要测量的结局是从治疗开始至少六个月后戒烟情况。我们采用了最严格的戒烟定义,如有报告,优先采用经生化验证的戒烟率。在适当情况下,我们使用Mantel-Haenszel固定效应模型进行Meta分析以得出风险比。
我们发现11项比较伐尼克兰与安慰剂用于戒烟的试验;其中3项试验包括安非他酮试验组。我们还发现1项比较伐尼克兰与安慰剂的预防复吸试验,以及2项比较伐尼克兰与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的开放标签试验。我们还纳入了1项试验,其中所有参与者均服用伐尼克兰,但接受了在线或电话或两种方式结合的行为支持。该试验未纳入分析,但有助于提供安全性和耐受性数据。纳入的研究涵盖超过10300名参与者,其中6892人使用了伐尼克兰。我们确定纳入1项金雀花碱(Tabex)试验。标准剂量伐尼克兰与安慰剂相比,六个月或更长时间持续戒烟的合并风险比(RR)(10项试验,4443人,排除1项评估长期安全性的试验)为2.31(95%置信区间[CI]2.01至2.66)。较低剂量或可变剂量的伐尼克兰也显示有效,RR为2.09(95%CI 1.56至2.78;4项试验,1272人)。伐尼克兰与安非他酮一年时的合并RR为1.52(95%CI 1.22至1.88;3项试验,1622人)。伐尼克兰与NRT在24周时的时点患病率戒烟RR为1.13(95%CI 0.94至1.35;2项试验,778人)。两项测试伐尼克兰超过12周标准疗程使用情况的试验发现,该药物在长期使用期间耐受性良好。伐尼克兰的主要不良反应是恶心,大多为轻度至中度,通常会随时间消退。上市后安全性数据引发了关于伐尼克兰与情绪低落、激动以及自杀行为或想法之间可能存在关联的疑问。伐尼克兰的标签在2008年进行了修订,制造商制作了一份用药指南。迄今为止,监测报告和试验数据的二次分析几乎没有支持因果关系的证据。本综述纳入的1项金雀花碱试验发现,在两年随访时,服用金雀花碱的戒烟参与者比服用安慰剂的更多,RR为1.61(95%CI 1.24至2.08)。
与未使用药物辅助的戒烟尝试相比,标准剂量的伐尼克兰使长期成功戒烟的机会增加了两到三倍。较低剂量方案也对戒烟有益,同时降低了不良事件的发生率。使用伐尼克兰成功戒烟的参与者比使用安非他酮的更多。两项伐尼克兰与NRT的开放标签试验表明伐尼克兰有一定益处,但置信区间不排除等效性。有限的证据表明伐尼克兰在预防复吸方面可能有作用。伐尼克兰的主要不良反应是恶心,但大多为轻度至中度,且往往会随时间消退。已报告了与严重不良事件(包括情绪低落、激动和自杀念头)的可能联系,但目前尚未得到证实。需要进一步开展基于社区的独立试验来测试伐尼克兰在不同合并症和风险模式吸烟者中的疗效和安全性。需要进一步开展治疗超过12周疗效的试验。金雀花碱也可能增加戒烟机会,但目前证据尚无定论。