• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗机构健康信息交换准备情况:与质量改进相关的成功协作指标的制定。

Hospital readiness for health information exchange: development of metrics associated with successful collaboration for quality improvement.

机构信息

University of Southern California, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2011 Aug;80(8):e178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.010
PMID:21330191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3112288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The development of readiness metrics for organizational participation in health information exchange is critical for monitoring progress toward, and achievement of, successful inter-organizational collaboration. In preparation for the development of a tool to measure readiness for data-sharing, we tested whether organizational capacities known to be related to readiness were associated with successful participation in an American data-sharing collaborative for quality improvement.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design, using an on-line survey of hospitals in a large, mature data-sharing collaborative organized for benchmarking and improvement in nursing care quality.

MEASUREMENTS

Factor analysis was used to identify salient constructs, and identified factors were analyzed with respect to "successful" participation. "Success" was defined as the incorporation of comparative performance data into the hospital dashboard.

RESULTS

The most important factor in predicting success included survey items measuring the strength of organizational leadership in fostering a culture of quality improvement (QI Leadership): (1) presence of a supportive hospital executive; (2) the extent to which a hospital values data; (3) the presence of leaders' vision for how the collaborative advances the hospital's strategic goals; (4) hospital use of the collaborative data to track quality outcomes; and (5) staff recognition of a strong mandate for collaborative participation (α=0.84, correlation with Success 0.68 [P<0.0001]).

CONCLUSION

The data emphasize the importance of hospital QI Leadership in collaboratives that aim to share data for QI or safety purposes. Such metrics should prove useful in the planning and development of this complex form of inter-organizational collaboration.

摘要

目的

制定组织参与健康信息交换的准备度指标对于监测和实现成功的组织间协作至关重要。在开发用于衡量数据共享准备度的工具之前,我们测试了与准备度相关的组织能力是否与成功参与美国数据共享质量改进合作有关。

设计

使用在线调查对一家大型成熟的数据共享合作组织中的医院进行横断面设计,该合作组织旨在进行基准测试和护理质量改进。

测量

使用因子分析来识别显著的结构,并且针对“成功”参与来分析已识别的因素。“成功”被定义为将比较绩效数据纳入医院仪表板。

结果

预测成功的最重要因素包括衡量组织领导力在培养质量改进文化方面的实力的调查项目(QI 领导力):(1)医院是否有支持性的医院行政人员;(2)医院对数据的重视程度;(3)领导者对合作如何推进医院战略目标的愿景;(4)医院使用合作数据来跟踪质量结果;以及(5)员工对合作的强烈授权的认可(α=0.84,与成功的相关性为 0.68[P<0.0001])。

结论

数据强调了医院 QI 领导力在旨在共享数据用于质量改进或安全目的的合作中的重要性。这些指标在规划和发展这种复杂形式的组织间合作时将非常有用。

相似文献

1
Hospital readiness for health information exchange: development of metrics associated with successful collaboration for quality improvement.医疗机构健康信息交换准备情况:与质量改进相关的成功协作指标的制定。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Aug;80(8):e178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
2
Nine states' use of collaboratives to improve children's health care quality in medicaid and CHIP.九个州利用合作组织提高医疗补助计划和儿童健康保险计划中儿童医疗保健质量的情况。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.008.
3
EMS Quality Improvement Programs急救医疗服务质量改进项目
4
Assessing organizational readiness for depression care quality improvement: relative commitment and implementation capability.评估组织对改善抑郁症护理质量的准备情况:相对承诺和实施能力。
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 2;9:173. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0173-1.
5
Exploration of contextual factors in a successful quality improvement collaborative in English ambulance services: cross-sectional survey.英国救护车服务中成功的质量改进协作的背景因素探索:横断面调查
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):77-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12438. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Organizational readiness for implementing change in acute care hospitals: An analysis of a cross-sectional, multicentre study.医疗机构实施变革的组织准备度:一项横断面、多中心研究分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Dec;74(12):2798-2808. doi: 10.1111/jan.13801. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
The influence of leadership behavior, organizational commitment, organizational support, subjective career success on organizational readiness for change in healthcare organizations.领导行为、组织承诺、组织支持、主观职业成功对医疗保健组织变革准备度的影响。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2018 Oct 1;31(4):354-370. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2017-0031. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU.协作式着装竞赛:一项 ICU 协作质量改进影响因素的定性案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):317-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001166. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
10
Nurses' views of organizational readiness for change.护士对变革准备程度的看法。
Nurs Forum. 2020 Apr;55(2):83-91. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12393. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and application of Breadth-Depth-Context (BDC), a conceptual framework for measuring technology engagement with a qualified clinical data registry.广度-深度-背景(BDC)概念框架的开发与应用,这是一种用于衡量与合格临床数据登记处技术参与度的概念框架。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 26;7(3):ooae061. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae061. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals.跨医院收集患者报告的结局和体验(PRO)数据的能力建设。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Sep;27(9):1460-1471. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03720-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Leadership in Integrated Care Networks: A Literature Review and Opportunities for Future Research.综合医疗网络中的领导力:文献综述与未来研究机会
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Aug 11;20(3):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5420.
4
Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers' Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study.影响门诊医疗服务提供者与附属及非附属合作伙伴进行健康信息电子交换的关键因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 7;7(4):e12000. doi: 10.2196/12000.
5
Evaluating a De-Centralized Regional Delivery System for Breast Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation for the Rural Underserved.评估一种针对农村医疗服务不足地区的分散式区域乳腺癌筛查及患者导航服务系统。
Tex Public Health J. 2014 Spring;66(2):25-34.
6
Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency?参与健康信息交换是否能提高医院的效率?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Sep;21(3):426-438. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9396-4. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.美国在实现健康信息交换全面实施方面面临的障碍。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.
8
Assessing organizational capacity for achieving meaningful use of electronic health records.评估实现电子健康记录有意义使用的组织能力。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Apr-Jun;39(2):124-33. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182860937.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance.医院用于衡量高可靠性绩效的护理敏感基准。
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00083.x.
2
Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;电子健康记录激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 28;75(144):44313-588.
3
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.电子健康记录的“有意义使用”规定。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
4
A Framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange.评估全国范围健康信息交换的成本、投入和价值的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000570.
5
Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.健康信息交换:持续存在的挑战和新策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):288-94. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003673.
6
Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.健康信息交换:明尼苏达州初级保健机构的参与情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):622-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54.
7
Lessons premier hospitals learned about implementing electronic health records.重点医院在实施电子健康记录方面的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):664-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0250.
8
The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.健康信息技术对美国医院质量的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):647-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0155.
9
Measuring meaningful use.衡量有意义的使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):601-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1023.
10
Success in health information exchange projects: solving the implementation puzzle.健康信息交换项目的成功:解决实施难题。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.041. Epub 2010 Feb 4.