Suppr超能文献

医疗机构健康信息交换准备情况:与质量改进相关的成功协作指标的制定。

Hospital readiness for health information exchange: development of metrics associated with successful collaboration for quality improvement.

机构信息

University of Southern California, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2011 Aug;80(8):e178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The development of readiness metrics for organizational participation in health information exchange is critical for monitoring progress toward, and achievement of, successful inter-organizational collaboration. In preparation for the development of a tool to measure readiness for data-sharing, we tested whether organizational capacities known to be related to readiness were associated with successful participation in an American data-sharing collaborative for quality improvement.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design, using an on-line survey of hospitals in a large, mature data-sharing collaborative organized for benchmarking and improvement in nursing care quality.

MEASUREMENTS

Factor analysis was used to identify salient constructs, and identified factors were analyzed with respect to "successful" participation. "Success" was defined as the incorporation of comparative performance data into the hospital dashboard.

RESULTS

The most important factor in predicting success included survey items measuring the strength of organizational leadership in fostering a culture of quality improvement (QI Leadership): (1) presence of a supportive hospital executive; (2) the extent to which a hospital values data; (3) the presence of leaders' vision for how the collaborative advances the hospital's strategic goals; (4) hospital use of the collaborative data to track quality outcomes; and (5) staff recognition of a strong mandate for collaborative participation (α=0.84, correlation with Success 0.68 [P<0.0001]).

CONCLUSION

The data emphasize the importance of hospital QI Leadership in collaboratives that aim to share data for QI or safety purposes. Such metrics should prove useful in the planning and development of this complex form of inter-organizational collaboration.

摘要

目的

制定组织参与健康信息交换的准备度指标对于监测和实现成功的组织间协作至关重要。在开发用于衡量数据共享准备度的工具之前,我们测试了与准备度相关的组织能力是否与成功参与美国数据共享质量改进合作有关。

设计

使用在线调查对一家大型成熟的数据共享合作组织中的医院进行横断面设计,该合作组织旨在进行基准测试和护理质量改进。

测量

使用因子分析来识别显著的结构,并且针对“成功”参与来分析已识别的因素。“成功”被定义为将比较绩效数据纳入医院仪表板。

结果

预测成功的最重要因素包括衡量组织领导力在培养质量改进文化方面的实力的调查项目(QI 领导力):(1)医院是否有支持性的医院行政人员;(2)医院对数据的重视程度;(3)领导者对合作如何推进医院战略目标的愿景;(4)医院使用合作数据来跟踪质量结果;以及(5)员工对合作的强烈授权的认可(α=0.84,与成功的相关性为 0.68[P<0.0001])。

结论

数据强调了医院 QI 领导力在旨在共享数据用于质量改进或安全目的的合作中的重要性。这些指标在规划和发展这种复杂形式的组织间合作时将非常有用。

相似文献

1
Hospital readiness for health information exchange: development of metrics associated with successful collaboration for quality improvement.
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Aug;80(8):e178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
2
Nine states' use of collaboratives to improve children's health care quality in medicaid and CHIP.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.008.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):317-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001166. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
10
Nurses' views of organizational readiness for change.
Nurs Forum. 2020 Apr;55(2):83-91. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12393. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

2
Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals.
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Sep;27(9):1460-1471. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03720-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Sep;21(3):426-438. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9396-4. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.
8
Assessing organizational capacity for achieving meaningful use of electronic health records.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Apr-Jun;39(2):124-33. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182860937.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance.
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00083.x.
3
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
4
A Framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000570.
5
Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):288-94. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003673.
6
Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):622-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54.
7
Lessons premier hospitals learned about implementing electronic health records.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):664-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0250.
8
The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):647-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0155.
9
Measuring meaningful use.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):601-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1023.
10
Success in health information exchange projects: solving the implementation puzzle.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.041. Epub 2010 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验